These laws will ban rewards for spending money within a game for the first time, ban rewards for buying consecutive microtransactions, and ban rewards for daily log-ins.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s so destructive that even China doesn’t like it

      They probably love that it’s hurting competing nations, though.

        • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If it was only money they wanted they would not do this. The limitations they are imposing will cut revenue to their biggest Game companies. I mean, the laws are not in effect and there was already a big crash on Netease and Tencent stock prices.

      • Synthuir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        To add onto what the others have said, the CCP isn’t shy about enforcing restrictions on digital media domestically. For instance, TikTok in China (Douyin) is quite different from the international version with strictly-enforced time limits, content restrictions, etc.

        • yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          But think about the CEO’s freedom of abusing gambling addicts outside of a safe environment with virtually no regulation and that can be used by kids and teens!

          I actually wouldn’t have anything against gacha games if they all were marked as Adult-only, even the most dumbass parents would think twice about buying EA FC if it had the AO rating.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            And not only AO, if it included the same required gambling-warnings other gambling system have to show every time they so much as mention their name.

        • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Probably because CCP wants other countries’ citizens to be addicted to games but not their own.

          How else would they have 9-9-6 model if Chinese youth started going down the path of Japanese hikikomoris?

      • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        China doing a better job regulating corporations than the west is nothing new.

        Even this current one happened while Tencent was barely recovering from another regulation set last year. Kicking megacorps while they’re down lol as they should.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    If there’s a behavior psychologist/researcher involved in the creation of a product, it’s evil, simple as. Those gacha games absolutely use them.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Didn’t China also recently introduce a limit of hours adolescents can game?

    The world would be a better place without those transactions in my opinion. It might sound extreme but in my view this is the first step towards gambling addiction.

    We as humanity are becoming really obsessed with everything digital instead of spending more time physically interacting with our peers. And unfortunately I am no exception.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I haven’t had a look at the original text from China, but wondering how much they accounted for. Any of these rules could be easily circumvented if they didn’t account for multiple scenarios.

    Rewards for spending money within a game for the first time

    “We don’t have a reward for spending money for the first time, but everyone does have a digital coupon for $5 off of their first $10 purchase when they make an account.”

    Rewards for buying consecutive microtransactions

    “The players don’t get any extras when they buy more of our digital currency, but every gacha pull does make the next 5 pulls a bit cheaper.”

    Rewards for daily log-ins.

    “No, we’re not giving rewards for daily log-ins, but players can buy this bonus that adds a gift-giving NPC to the main town for 30 days, who will trade a small parcel of premium currency for a single gold coin once per day.”

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I guess we just shouldn’t make any law about anything since people can go “well akshually” about it. /s

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s not what I’m saying. I was just hoping this law has teeth, because companies who are greedy for money will always try to circumvent whatever new restrictions are sent their way.

        I’m thinking back to earlier policies set by China like the restrictions against showing undead/human remains in video games. World of Warcraft set up all these euphemistic workarounds to circumvent the law while realistically changing as little as possible, basically defeating the purpose of it.

        China outlawed loot boxes, but then season passes and gatcha models were implemented in short order to continue exploiting consumers. If the law doesn’t account for all sorts of scenarios that can be abused, it’s just going to be a game of cat and mouse.