Edit:

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow.

    Almost three years into a new console generation, but let’s port it to a 10 year-old console instead.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, it does make sense. Xbox consoles already have it through backwards compatibility, porting it to PS4 means PS5 users can also play it. It seems like a straight port, not a remaster.

      • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which means nothing in terms of graphics or performance improvements.

        And no doubt Rockstar/Take Two will ask a premium price for it.

        • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How much improvements in graphics are you asking for on a port to the Switch?

          People bitch and moan about games not being available. And then they always criticize games when they’re available. What happened to just enjoying a good game for what it is?

      • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I actually like the “cheap” ports to get games onto modern platforms.

        I know people wanted RDR1 in the RDR2 engine. And that would be great. But this is closer to a GoG release where it is just “oh, cool. Always wanted to play that”

        • all-knight-party@kbin.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I prefer RDR1’s more painterly look to RDR2’s more realistic direction anyhow, so as long as the game itself is in a high resolution and runs well then I think itll hold up just fine

          • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly? Same. Outside of stuff like the snowstorm (that was arguably the death of Stadia…), I genuinely think RDR1 running under backwards compatibility on an xbox looks better than RDR2. Fewer polygons and material shaders but the art style is just so much more conducive to breathtaking set pieces.

    • Tati@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least ps5 is backwards compatible, but disappointed it’s not on pc ;(

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This could be one step towards that. A PS4 release means it’s been ported to x86 hardware (the 360 did not have x86 hardware and the X1/XSX version is basically emulation with enhancements)

  • Kovu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    where pc version :( well, switch emulation is pretty good now I guess…

  • Mdotaut801@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wow. That’s sweet. Hey I can cook tempura shrimp and throw on some rice in the cooker. Bueno?

    Edit: in my stoned state I posted what I meant to text my gf. I’ll leave it. But yeah, red dead on switch? Are we sure that’ll even run?

    • bobbysq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Switch should run it fine, it’s about as powerful as the consoles the game originally came out on.

  • ceiling@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    this is just embarrassing. Simple cash grab. I can’t imagine it will be better than running on Xenia or RPCS3

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, but those don’t run on ps4/5 or switch and they aren’t selling it on PC so what’s the problem?

      It’s okay for developers to re release old games on modern consoles. It’s okay.

      • 💡dim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        without even a FPS boost to 60fps? For £50

        nah, thats not ok. by any stretch.

        Especially when the PS3 version was (as far as I recall) available streamed on PS+ Premium tier/PS Now

  • 💡dim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Switch Users - This is amazing, will be able to play Red Dead Redemption on the go

    PS5 Users - a 10 year old game, with no fps boost, no graphics boost, for £50? **** Off R*

  • Chirp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This port is like two to three years too late. Playing AAA games from over a decade ago on the go is not as interesting as it used to be on switch.

  • 30isthenew29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Curious to see what consessions need to be made for Switch. Just get the coders from the Doom port and we’re good👌

      • 30isthenew29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Awesome! Have played it a bit on PS3 and I am interested in finishing that on my Switch.

      • 30isthenew29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Awesome! Have played it a bit on PS3 and I am interested in finishing that on my Switch.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the hardware when handheld is about what the PS3/Xbox 360 gen could do, just with a bit more RAM.

        I wouldn’t expect 60 fps, but it should be about what the original was, even if it’s the usual Rockstar “can’t be arsed” unoptimised mess.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since RDR2 is a prequel, I wonder how many people out there played through 2’s story, and then just wanted to see the grim, slow turnout to the story of that gang. It IS kinda surprising it was never available on PS4 - a lot of PS360 games got “silent ports” that just never got much advertising.

  • LCP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone shared this in a Discord server I’m in:

    Take-Two Chairman and CEO Strauss Zelnick: “…we don’t just port titles over, we actually take the time to do the very best job we can making the title different for the new release, for the new technology that we’re launching it on.https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/rockstar-owner-discusses-remasters-strategy-says-its-not-interested-in-simple-ports/ [2021]

    I guess that memo got lost.

    They also managed to botch the GTA trilogy remaster though, so I don’t know what to think of this.