Office mandates don’t help companies make more money, study finds::Three years after the coronavirus pandemic sent people to work from home in record numbers, U.S. employers are still struggling to get people back to the office.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    10 months ago

    Companies likely lose money with more workers in the office. More electricity, more water, more supplies. More unhappy employees, more tired employees, more good employees looking elsewhere for WFH jobs.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      10 months ago

      Probably sunk cost fallacy with the lease. Building is paid for, why not use it and also be better able to micromanage your drones?

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s also to do with the fact that most research looks at company profit. But if you follow the paper trails, most of the high level managers that insist on return to office are investors on commercial real state ventures and/or funds that invest in these downtowns and office spaces. It’s bad for the company, but it’s good for their personal wallets. The authoritarian high is a plus.

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      But management makes all the decisions and having everyone physically accessible to their need for control makes them feel better.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 months ago

    Amazing how when the argument is coming from the bottom up you have to have evidence, facts, numbers, etc. But when it comes from the top down “just knowing” and “a feeling” is more than enough.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      Every middle manager I know is openly opposed to forced RTO. It’s a huge pain in the ass from a policy enforcement perspective because, in their enthusiasm to make sure people are taking it seriously, they’ve decreased managers’ discretion for attendance. Now employees have to take a sick day if they can’t come in, even if they’re perfectly capable of working from home (eg a software dev with a broken ankle), or else have to jump through multiple hoops with HR.

      I actually kind of like my office. It helps that I have an actual office to myself of course, but I do like the ability to put together a quick hallway chat or grab a room with a whiteboard and even just appreciate the higher bandwidth of communication I can get when physically present. But I also want to allow people to work from home if they’re having a TV delivered or if their kid is sick.

      The standard, now rote, response from everyone up to the director level is pretty much “I know, it sucks. But it’s policy, and if you don’t do it there’s going to be consequences that I will not be able to handle for you.” They may put a happy spin on things for newsletters, but from where I’m from it’s seen as a legacy from an older culture running at the level of VPs and above who don’t have a direct hand in operations.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would rather have my team happy and working well rather than bitching about a crappy commute. I don’t enforce the organisation’s WFH rules on my team

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      And also just laziness. It takes more effort in leading a remote team and initiating intentional communication instead of doing the good ol’ drive-by management and let communication and coordination up to “your in the same room, you figure it out”.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s much harder to hide corruption when everything is being recorded!

        As an anecdote I work in a 20 person team and we hardly have any managers nor meetings. I honestly haven’t even seen many of my coworkers I work with daily but we all keep loads of records from boards, to RFCs to traditional docs and wrap that all up with daily stand-ups. We’re incredibly productive.

        Remote is amazing when done well and I don’t see how any CEO could say otherwise with a straight face. It saves so much money that all the “connection” gaps can be easily filled in with team building and workations and other events.

        It is the future, well its already the present but many haven’t caught up to it yet.

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          The argument I see in articles is engagement. Remote workers are less likely to give feedback and are less loyal to the company they say.

          I’m not sure remote work is responsible for that. There have been enough meetings where everybody in the office just nods along and loyalty went out the window after layoff waves became normal.

          Although there is a camaraderie that is easier to build in office that keeps people around a bit longer, office politics also erodes that goodwill.

          • Holyginz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Companies themselves are responsible for less loyalty to the company. If a company doesn’t take care of their employees they never deserved their loyalty to begin with.

  • GhostFence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Good. Hope all these office mandating companies go out of business. No more of people being forced into these mandatory COVID infection labs just to make a living.

  • lapommedeterre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think return to office mandates are silly. Regardless, it’s more about maintaining the office market values, right? So basically need to accept that’s where things are going and that will inevitably happen.

    I’m not an economist, so I don’t know the full implications of it all, but I know things will be in for a ride.

    • GhostFence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      There was an article a while back about how RTO brings profits to stores inside the office buildings - gift shops, restaurants, etc. Externally speaking: oil companies. There is a lot of vampirism involved in RTO that is obvious… and far more that’s not.

  • viralJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is probably going to be an unpopular comment, but I wanted to present the view in favour of what I call WFW (working from work). I’m sure it’s always going to be different for specific cases, but I do see benefits of WFW. We have an open plan office and a lot of casual conversations between us turn into serious conversations about projects and sometimes they have important outputs. Sometimes you overhear a conversation that you realise you know something about and you make a valuable contribution to it. None of this happens when people are WingFH. I’m lucky enough that my only line report is a hard working person, so I let them WFH probably a bit more than other managers let their reports, but I still like when they are WFW because of the contributions that they make to those conversations I mentioned above.

    I’m an introvert, so I totally get the argument of being able to focus better when you’re not surrounded by people and their conversations, but at the same time I honestly noticed that my productivity decreases when I WFH. I’m sufficiently honest with myself to notice that and feel bad about it and this is actually the main reason why I do commute for an hour every day just to WFW, even though our company policy says that we can WFH 3 days a week and my job is 95% desk based.

    I think it’s often has to considered for individual cases because as I said, my report does 110% whether they WFH or WFW, but I know from other managers that some of their reports really stuttered and stumbled when they were asked “so you WedFH yesterday, what did you do exactly?”

    I’m not trying to say “everyone should stop WFH”, but it seems to me that most of the comments in this post are aligning with “just let your employees WFH!” and I wanted to present the other point of view, from the perspective of a non-senior manager who also has some non managerial responsibilities himself.

    • HeartSpoken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      this is a flimsy argument I keep hearing office- enthusiasts grasp at. there’re other variations to the random, impromptu conversation/not-meeting but they all share the argument that “one may accidentally contribute something to unofficial meetings”.

      how often does that happen? is overhearing and joining random conversations a business plan? is this such a common occurrence and the outcomes so beneficial and so pronounced that they balance out the very long list of demonstrable and concrete arguments against working from work, such as time lost in transit and CO2 emissions from the pollution of transit?

      if something needs more planning and discussion, or reconsideration, then schedule a proper meeting.

      • viralJ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        is overhearing and joining random conversations a business plan?

        That really made me laugh. No, of course it’s not a business plan. I was just trying to make a point that there are benefits to people being together in the office.

    • NOSin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Numerous studies have proven that WFH is better for production, morale of the worker, and then the plethora of perks that comes with not having to go to work.

      It doesn’t make your point null, but you’re more or less just the exception that confirms the rule.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Don’t you know that personal anecdotal quirks completely override all scientific conclusions for all people, everywhere, at all times?