If lemmy.world finds this, please tell my starving children that I love them.

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re not far left enough for me if you’re still thinking that instead of “let’s go grab the guillotine”

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The replies to this are insane. These people are actively harming millions. Its their fault if the world forms a fist aimed at their faces.

    • Soulg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s fine with me, I don’t have any interest in “let’s just kill a bunch of people” as an ideology. It’s objectively wrong.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s not the ideology though, guillotine memes are essentially just pushing for revolutionary restructuring of the state and economy. Nobody simply thinks “kill rich” and stops thinking there.

      • harmsy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        In this case it would be self-defense. The only reason anyone thinks otherwise is because the danger posed by a billionaire money hoarder is far more abstract than what most people are accustomed to.

    • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Far left in my country would be terrorist organizations from the leftover decades where terrorist groups formed around the Soviet communist idea.

    • Candelestine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      This argument is basically the same as those put forward by the right wing nut jobs that think their second amendment rights to tote a rifle will let them fight against the US govt.

      Just because a method functioned a couple centuries ago in a far simpler time, does not mean it will function today. Gotta keep up with the times there gramps.

  • nighty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the poor are hungry, they call me a communist. - Hélder Câmara, an archbishop

  • Mahonia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is kind of an aside but it’s always weird looking at caricatures of poverty from the 90s and earlier, where people live in modest homes they seem to own. Or people living alone in plain apartments in places like New York.

    A six-figure salary in so many cities means that you can probably rent a decent apartment and never own anything. It’s just so obvious that this system isn’t working.

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Tax should pay for healthcare of all citizens.

    Why am I paying tax if I still have to pay to see a doctor?

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    as somewhat of a ‘commie’ yea kinda, but again its crazy that someone who toils away at work for the better part of his life and earns a salary for his contribution to society will sometimes have to be hungry or homeless. on average you do all that and are at least always struggling for money come on.

    considering we have smartphones, rockets and AI, at this point im surprised some people are not considering alternatives.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you think the Means of Production should be owned collectively, or individually? Do you agree with horizontal power structures being dominant, or do you believe more in centralization?

      There’s a ton more to it, but those 2 questions pretty clearly give you a direction.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pretty sure the general attitude toward .world is that the users tend to be liberals, especially those who came from Reddit during the API fiasco. Generally people who mean well but probably haven’t engaged with the Linux, FOSS, Privacy, Anarchist, Socialist, or Communist communities before coming to Lemmy.

      .ml itself is generally more leftist, a common misconception is that there are only Marxist-Leninists on .ml, when there are tons of Anarchists and Socialists as well, just much fewer liberals.

      Where Hexbear is a big-tent “dirt bag left” server, and lemmygrad is an explicitly Marxist-Leninist-Maoist server, .ml is actually just focused on FOSS and privacy, and as such tends to attract more leftists than .world.

      An example of the differences between .world and .ml I have noticed are on the recent death sentence for the KyoAni mass murderer posts. On the .world version, most seemed celebratory of the death sentence, while on .ml most were deeply saddened by the event but held the belief that the death penalty is wrong fundamentally, and that instead it should’ve been life in prison.

      Just my 2 cents as a .ml user.

  • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I really wouldn’t mind the whole rhetoric of pulling yourself by the bootstraps if it wasn’t rigged. The system is literally made to make ppl fail.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s also the fact that it originated as an expression meaning “doing something impossible” since pulling on your own bootstraps would PREVENT you from getting up.

  • SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why is the proposed solution always to just pay people more and not just make things cost less? The only reason I can find is that making things cost less doesn’t provide a scapegoat for everybody to rally behind, even though it would be more effective.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because the stock market is the economy as far as our leaders are concerned. And they decided that anything other than green line go up is abhorrent.

    • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Money is a means of determining the distribution of resources. It doesn’t matter if stuff costs less or if people make more money, what matters is that nessecities, at a minimum, are more equitably distributed. You can make that end goal take different forms. Money is a little awkward for that end because you use money to purchase both food and nice cars.

  • bigFab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I used to be that guy the first 28 years of my life. Then I realized many so called socialist gvt are backed up by the biggest monopolies, which in turn grow freely thanks to socialist unbalanced rules of competitiveness.

    It’s cool to think socialist. It’s not cool to feed the monopoly.

  • mydude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    When you are to the left of someone, they always call you right-wing… Never fails…

      • mydude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think the down-votes illustrates my point exactly.

        I’m pro expression of freedom, full bodily automony (my body, my choice), anti censorship, reign in corporate power, higher top marginal tax, ending foreign wars (inc Ukraine), diplomacy with every government (inc the ones labeled terrorists. Remember; Nelson Mandela was also labeled a terrorist), tax included high education, tax included healthcare, more money to public transport.

        Well thats some of it, and most of the first points are traditional left-wing issues, but in todays society, you get “right-wing” label immediately.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right vs left is about Capitalism vs Socialism, and generally upholding hierarchy vs abolishing it.

          You would not get labeled right wing based on those views unless you had other nonsense going on in tandem.

          • mydude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I would absolutely agree with you on your first paragraph.

            But please answer this honestly, “my body, my choice” during covid was labeled “right-wing”, you agree?

            Doing diplomacy with Putin to end Ukraine war was also labeled “right-wing” putin puppet talking points, no?

            Both these are traditional left-wing values.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              “My body, my choice” was not a right-wing stance. It was instead an anti-science movement. If you just listen to the words, its easy to think it might be leftist, but the intent behind it was absolutely far-right. A good comparison is “All Lives Matter” or even “White Lives Matter” as a response to “Black Lives Matter.”

              Diplomacy with Putin to end the war can be right or left. Opposing Imperialism is left wing, what matters is the way you wish to conduct diplomacy, and to what outcome.

              So yea, good chance you could be right wing.

              • mydude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                “Believe in science”, that’s anti-science. “My body, my choice” has always been in context of abortion, and viewed as left wing. Here it’s the exact same words, the exact same meaning in context of taking an experimental redefined definition of a vaccine. It’s in this setting that characters make or breaks. If you cannot uphold your values when they matter, you don’t have values, you have hobbies.

              • mydude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Here are the rules in Norway from our FHI.

                https://www.fhi.no/va/vaksinasjonsveilederen-for-helsepersonell/vaksinasjon/lover-og-regler-ved-vaksinasjon/?term=#vaksinasjon-er-frivillig

                Vaksinasjon er frivillig All vaksinasjon i Norge er frivillig. Personer som anbefales eller ber om vaksine må få tilstrekkelig informasjon om fordeler og ulemper ved vaksinering til å kunne ta et informert valg. Det skal også være åpenhet om usikkerhet og kunnskap som mangler.

                Translate it and see for yourself.

                If you are to the left of someone, and they are not informed, they will call you right-wing.