Tech Used to Be Bleeding Edge, Now it’s Just Bleeding | After a decade of scandals and half-assed product launches, people are no longer buying the future Big Tech is selling.::After a decade of scandals and half-assed product launches, people are no longer buying the future Big Tech is selling.

  • Contestant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The entire article is just an ad for a blog that doesn’t exist yet… The irony is unbearable.

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      No? It’s a cover page for an hour long podcast episode. Not that that’s much better, as I am certainly not going to set aside time for that, but it’s not “just an ad for a blog that doesn’t exist yet”.

    • Shadywack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly, to the layperson they need an explanation about the AI-washing fad amongst others. It surprises me how many people don’t know about the Google graveyard. The Stadia launch is still fresh on my memory with how it was suppose to be the next major step forward.

      When we hear about the next major step forward so many times…but as for this blog post, it’s almost as though they want to have the comments write the blog for them based on a superficial notion. Just like big tech.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    We went from, “here’s some cool tech we built, you should buy it because it’s awesome and we’ll make some money” to “how do we screw every last cent out of our customers whilst providing the bare minimum?”

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, isn’t that the better way of doing it? One popup, exains everything, gives you the option to opt out in that popup instead of going through settings and shit.

      • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think it’s intentionally wordy and the opt-out is “on” by default. I am usually instinctively just trying to hit the “off” button as quickly as possible and hitting save so I can get rid of the window, without actually reading anything. I almost certainly would have accidentally opted in to third party tracking.

        I fully admit I might just be dumb though.

        • RisingSwell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It could be less wordy, it isn’t perfect. I have definitely run into ones that require going through multiple layers of settings though, so this just seems a lot less bullshit than that.

          Looking at the image again, default to not sharing while calling that ‘on’ and being slightly awkward is definitely not an accident and is probably designed to trick people paying no attention at all.

    • Holyginz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I took a look at the website provided and holy shit there are a lot of downstream providers. And when i click on the link for the first site I immediately get a pop-up warning from ublock.

        • Holyginz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It is. I thought It would let you opt out at that site. Nope you have to go to each of the leech sites individually and of course they are going to make it difficult as hell to opt out if they even allow it at all.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I was talking to my daughter yesterday about H. G. Wells and the one film he wrote the screenplay for, the 1936 film Things to Come.

    In the film, a great world war starts in 1940 with an air attack on Britain (surprisingly prescient, but the rest isn’t). The war lasts until 1970 until Britain is completely destroyed and petty dictators rule tiny patches of land in the wastes. But men of science return to Britain and rebuild it as a scientific utopia.

    Wells was a scientific technocrat. He thought that scientists should be in charge of things because there was nothing technology could do that wouldn’t eventually lift humanity up and bring about a paradise on Earth…

    So why did he also write The Time Machine, where everything falls apart and humanity splits into two species, both unintelligent? Because he was also a socialist and he saw what capitalism and the class system was doing to the world (The War of the Worlds was also about this, a critique of Western colonialism).

    So over 100 years ago, H. G. Wells was telling us that we were on a path to either scientific utopia or destruction due to our embracing old modes of thinking.

    What would he have made of capitalists using technology to end civilization?