• Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I always read this type of statement as man = species.

    I know this particular thinking is falling out of fashion but it’s not totally dead yet

    • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s the correct interpretation of that use of the word, and the quote in the post is meaning to use it in that way before pretending it’s a gotcha.

      The term man (from Proto-Germanic *mann- “person”) and words derived from it can designate any or even all of the human race regardless of their sex or age. In traditional usage, man (without an article) itself refers to the species or to humanity (mankind) as a whole.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_(word)

    • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that was the intent behind the original wording. The interpretation of this being the remnant of a female human makes sense to me, but as this is an anecdotal account of Sandi Toksvig’s time in university, we really have no idea if this is a good example of the lack of a female perspective in anthropology or just a convenient strawman to make a point.

      In any case, cool meme.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know about English, but in French in the 19th century men did enforce the use of homme (men) instead of humain (human) in the déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen, and in the language, because they did want to segregate women. It was a purposeful and deliberate decision.

      I am convinced it’s exactly the same in English.

  • jackpot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    i think they mean ‘man’ as in ‘mankind’. also any ideas why would they carve it into bone and not bark or something more flat?

  • Aqarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    IIRC “Calendar” was one of the proposed solutions, but the bone actually had a lot more than 28 holes. It’s one of the reasons it’s purpose is considered unknown.

    I always find this particular strain of antiintellectualism deeply ironic, because it claims to oppose women being forgotten, but the premise assumes the “scientists” are all male.

  • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    For some reason I thought they meant they carved the calendar on their own bone and thought “damn that’s metal af”.

    Anyway, don’t farmers also need to tell the date? Was this bone from before we started doing that?

      • Fishbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        First off: Everyone who played the historical documentary Brutal Legend knows that metal was a gift from the gods.

        Second: Miocene epoch heavy metal is my favorite genre!

  • Demonen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    It occurs to me that the solution might be to start referring to men as “wermen” again, and revert “men” to it’s gender neutral roots. That also means we can have a bunch of other prefixes for other genders.

    Languages are fun.

  • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’m a woman and I have never needed to chart 28 days.

    that screenshot up there reads like some academic person with too much time on their hands trying too hard to congratulate themselves for solving some anthropological mystery.

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      But since before you were born people knew how long a woman’s menstrual cycle lasts. Most likely the Internet existed when you became an adult and thought about measuring things. The society you lived in had existing calendars that you were aware of if/when you had a menstrual cycle. You’ve never needed to “chart 28 days” but someone who lived long long ago may have wondered and they would have had no frame of reference so they decided to count.

    • astreus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t get it either. Weren’t most, if not all, ancient calendars lunar based? Far easier to work out a 28 day cycle than a 365.25 day cycle.

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sandi is a comedian and presenter of UK show QI, not a researcher. She’s literally just talking about an epiphany.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Believe it or not, in civilized countries it’s common for people to get higher education for the sake of education.

          Her predecessor on QI, mr. Stephen Fry, was also an OxBridge fellow – known as one of Britain’s greatest comedians.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why wouldn’t a male have figured out a lunar cycle and tried to track the moon? Not that the female explanation is lesser in any regard, but why exclude all possibilities?

  • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am sure the comments on this meme community post in a niche social media site will not be filled with butthurt men’s rights activists.

  • uSpetzWon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    a man with a wife.

    it’s good to know when it’s time to spend couple of days hunting the sabre tooth tiger.

  • HollowNaught@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m confused by this quote - no sane person would assume a male did something just because we say man did it. In this instance, man would simply be referencing humanity

    The want to define whether a male or female did it without any evidence is simply sexist

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Never mind anything, making the abstract connection between one event and the number of marks you scratch on a wall was probably the equivalent of genius of the time, the first mathematician.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yep. A bit like a 7 day publicly displayed tracker of days on a 28 day lunar calendar cycle.

    Was “I am the God of your Father” an editorial attempt to distinguish the deity from the gods of Egypt, or from the god of a Mother?

    There’s some pretty odd details in that book, like in Isaac’s supposed patriarchal blessing which discussed “the sons of your mother bow down to you” or it being the only place there’s the male form of gebirah (“Great Lady”) - a title first applied in the text to Isaac’s mother whose name is based on the word for ‘chief.’ Who is supposedly later followed by a figure ‘Deborah’ (‘bee’) who is a leader of the people around the time we now know bees were being imported into Tel Rehov and regularly requeened to avoid genetic drift with local bee populations. Also weird that the events regarding a “land of milk and honey” supposedly take place in a land with no honey and only one discovered apiary.

    That apiary gets burned down right around the time Asa allegedly deposed his grandmother the gebirah (“Great Lady”).