• doublejay1999@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Indeed ! This Would be much easier to take seriously if Sundar hadn’t meet with Sunak, Modi, Biden et al. In the first year or so since getting the job.

  • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “THE WORKPLACE IS NOT FOR POLITICS”

    — With love, your employer who is investing amounts of money beyond your comprehension in a government of a country now being tried for genocide with undenial and ongoing human rights violations.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ok, so if I find out I work for Nazi contractor and object to that, it is politics?

    • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Discussing politics at the work place has been an HR violation for some time, but speaking against the company policy or its customers has always been a fireable ofense. I’m not sure why this surprises anyone.

      Sure, google is an evil corporation and there’s lots of reasons to hate them, but why are we focusing on this specific thing which is common across all workplaces?

      And yes, if you find out your employer is constructing concentration camps and you openly speak against that, you’re probably going to lose your job. Why is this even a question?

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Lol you’re getting tossed in jail doing this in a communist society…this isn’t about capitalism at all. It’s about keeping people from creating a hostile work environment, look how polarized politics is online, shit gets heated in a work setting? It’s a no go for any sane company wanting to keep the peace between employees.

          • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            If the employees owned the firm, then no they are not.

            Authoritarian Communism? Yup, it sucks too and I’d call that out.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              There isn’t anything stopping workers now from creating employee own companies. They exist today.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think maybe you’re conflating capitalism and politics.

            The need for workers to voice out against company policies and actions often necessary for safety of workers, customers, etc. This is required for capitalism to work to any standard.

            Its not hard to see how firing employees for noting safety problems can cause problems. The obvious case for this is Boeing where they started punishing people for doing basic quality control work.

      • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Discussing politics at the work place has been an HR violation for some time, but speaking against the company policy or its customers has always been a fireable ofense. I’m not sure why this surprises anyone.

        Looks like a navel-gazing USA thing. Here in Europe I cannot imagine that there’s many companies who’d fire workers for protesting or tells them to shut up forever.

          • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s not actually true. Even in Sweden, employees can be fired for misconduct and what constitutes misconduct is a complex matter. But more importantly, in the Tesla case, those employees are on strike which is a different issue.

            • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              They can be fired for misconduct, yes, What makes you think protests or giving opinons on work related mtter, possibly supoorted by a union, would be interpreted as “misconduct”? Can you give an example of a case like that where misconduct was having an issue with selling products to war criminals or similar?

              • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Publicly labeling customers as “war criminals” is misconduct and will get you fired anywhere in the world, yes. Stop pretending you misunderstand this simple fact.

        • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You should be aware of the fact that Google & the others have offices in Europe and they have the same policy here too. These type of policies fit well within the legal framework in most EU countries. And I guarantee that people would get fired over protests disrupting the workplace if found unwarranted.

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not being able to discuss politics at work is not really the case for everyone though, it’s worker politics that aren’t allowed, if the politics agree with the owner class they’ll set up a PAC for it. Whoever heard of an executive or board member fired for discussing politics that paint the organization in a positive light? I also think it’s worth pointing out most companies would fire for this and are authoritative in structure and don’t allow for democratic practices like elections, petitioning, protesting, etc. Just because it’s that way now doesn’t mean it always will be with good labor protections.

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        which is common across all workplaces?

        In your shithole country, maybe.

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Even if we ignore what @prole wrote, in civilized countries you’re allowed to break company policy if it infringes your rights, regardless of what a contract says.

            • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              you’re allowed to break company policy if it infringes your rights

              No country guarantees you the right to openly discuss politics in the workplace though.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 months ago

    “The workplace isn’t for politics” is about social etiquette, not criticizing what your own company is taking part in you stupid fuck.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “Google isnt the place for your politics. It is only a place for my politics. So get in line with my thinking or get the fuck out!” - Googles Chief Cunt.

  • qprimed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    google the company needs to be garroted with their old “don’t be evil” line.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t be evil tell me your opinions

      Don’t ask don’t tell in corporate form!

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    The little-known genocide assistance exception to “don’t be evil.” You have to read the fine print these days.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        If I’m not mistaken there’s a more long winded watered down version at the end of a bunch of bs now. I may be misremembering or out of the loop on subsequent updates and changes though

        • Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes it’s still there, it was just moved, albeit from a very noticeable position to quite an obscure one.

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Gotcha. Yeah thats more or less how I remembered it… 🙃

            Its a bummer, I used to consider myself a fan of Google’s direction. But lesson learned I suppose, money is power and power corrupts.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    Weird how all the right wingers that constantly yell about how silencing nazis is censorship are suddenly very quiet when a ceo comes out and explicitly says you will be fired for your speech.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s about making money for executives and shitting on the employees that do the actual work.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Riiight… the fact that corporations are petty dictatorships isn’t political at all.

    Right.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Never worked for one of the big tech firms, but I have been in the working world for ~16 years and one of the few things anyone that has been around for awhile can and will agree on is you don’t talk about salary within earshot of the boss, you don’t badmouth company decisions within earshot of the boss, you don’t talk about politically charged topics, and you certainly don’t combine 2 of those 3 and protest company decisions on politically charged issues literally in the office.

    You also don’t do those things on company provided equipment, software, or services. If you want to bitch about something the company is doing, you go out to lunch or do it after hours, preferably without written or video evidence.

    While I think it is gross that Google fired them for this, given the history of the company almost encouraging such things, I can say these people just got a hard lesson that most of us learn about the corporate world long before we make it to working for the likes of Google.

    Rightly or wrongly freedom of speech, assembly, etc protects you from the Government, not your boss. And your boss is a petty little ego maniac that controls your livelihood, so best to stay out of his gaze on matters you know he/she would view negatively where at all possible.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m shocked that people are only just now finding out that massive companies like Google are evil. Google replaced don’t be evil with be evil.