• MacGuffin94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t want a dumb phone. I want a circa 2014 smart phone that is not expected to replace my laptop and serve as a constant data stream for corporations. I want to be able to visit a website on my phone and not have it try to get me to download an app, be ads on 70% of the screen, or just be unreadable formatting. Let me call, text, do a basic online search, play a stupid flash game, and take my money. Stop being greedy and trying to make everything I do monetizable

    • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      There is something about the Palm Pre or Jolla Sailfish OS that was so endearing back then. Devices that support it just don’t exist.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Dumb phones don’t help you for tickets, boarding passes, tap to pay, etc. those things require strong security, not the latest tech. I’ve got a few teenage kids and even for them it’s not very practical to exist without a smartphone.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want to be able to pull up an 80% version of a website on my phone, and have a button to open the full website on my computer for when I get home.

    • fpslem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      2014 phones also fit in my hand. I miss that size, you can’t even find them now.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    People want phones that don’t cost $1000+, lack basic features and constantly prey on their personal data. That’s what they want. Some express that by saying they want “dumb phones”, but the first part is the larger driver here.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      A big part of the markup is simply the proprietary systems that run the phone. Apple’s restrictive OS, combined with the planned obsolescence strategy for older units, corral their customer base into buying newer models every 3-5 years.

      Android’s open system allows for competitor brands to compete alongside the bigger publishers - Samsung and Sony and Lenova and Motorola. But even then, we’ve lost the more modular phone design to a hobbyist-hostile manufacturing strategy that precludes people from swapping out old batteries or doing basic repairs.

      This, combined with data providers that try to bake the price of new phones into the subscription service (AT&T, Verizon, and Tmobile all offering “free” phone upgrades on painfully expensive plans) make the industry this extractive rent-seeking mess.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want those things and I want a phone that’s easy to use, doesn’t constantly advertise to me, and is more of a helpful tool than a distraction.

      • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think that last bit is more of a ‘what you make of it’ situation, regardless of how smart or dumb a phone is.

        Unfortunately the manufacturers want the data and advertising revenue, and they’d only be persuaded to offer an alternative if they made the same amount of money.

        If each sale of a $900 smart phone gives them $100 of ad revenue over a couple years, I’d bet my bottom dollar they would charge $200 for the ‘dumb’ version.

        • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think the distractions are partially a user issue and partially a company issue. Companies make their programs noisy with notifications by default that I only change it once I’ve found it annoying. They also make their program so bloated that they are slow to load and execute. By the time the app loads, I’ve lost my flow and now the tool is a nuisance. My mind is already cluttered. I don’t need tech to slow it down.

          • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I see what you mean. People use their devices at different levels. That may not be the best way to put it.

            My meaning is that a portion of the users will be the type to spend a couple hours digging through each setting on a new device to set it to their needs. Another group will use the device with minimal initial adjustments, and tweak things as they find things they don’t like. Then there’s a third group that will almost never open a preferences panel and just use a device by its factory settings, likely to never consider potential improvements to their user experience.

            From what you’ve said, I imagine your in that second group. I myself am in the first one I described; I look at the options of any hardware I purchase or software I download before I actually begin to use it.

            Unfortunately - in the context of this post - the number of people in that third group I imagine outnumber us by multiple orders of magnitude, and therefore companies with shareholders to appease will always manufacture devices with as much bloat and advertising and invasive data mining as they can be paid to put in.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Dumb phones don’t have all the gooey “track everything we do” goodness in the middle so I doubt it.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Exactly. If dumbphones made a comeback, companies would simply achieve it by presenting the user with a dumb UI while the data harvesting would still go on in the background.

        I guess there’s the valid argument that you’d be doing less on your phone so there’d be less to spy on, but there’d still be spying, and much of it would simply be shifted to the user’s PC instead of a smartphone. Guess what, spying is rife there too.

        The answer to stopping the spying is privacy laws that put people, and their privacy, above tax-dodging multinationals.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want a real software dev team for linux phones. I don’t have programming knowledge, but I can pitch in for a reoccurring crowdfund to pay them. The Pinephone is nice hardware, but Pine64 has always said that they’re leaving the software up to the community.

      • tux7350@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The name is silly but the Galaxy XCover 6 pro checks all those boxes as a new phone. It even has the old style notification light, different colors for notifications.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t think people really want dumbphones, I think they just want apps that better support their self-control. Digital Wellbeing on Android is a start, but it’s way too easy to bypass.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want people to stop thinking that their little quip to me is of the utmost importance. I want people to wait a few hours to tell me something instead of calling me while I’m driving and act insulted when I tell them to hurry up because I’m either driving or pulled over.

      • ji17br@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you don’t like being disturbed while driving you should use do not disturb while driving.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m a farmer. There’s always the chance the someone is hurt in a field and is calling for help.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ew, people call you? All my friends text, because they know we are busy adults, I’ll get to the chat when I can get to the chat. Little monster stays on vibration only or complete silence until I decide so. I control the damn thing not the other way around. Everybody who knows me or I give my phone number knows that phone call means someone died, there’s blood everywhere, or the building got set on fire. Nothing else requires phone call level urgency.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Phone calls are for urgency and very often I do need to respond quickly. I also expect and am disappointed when people don’t answer calls from me because I only call for urgent matters.

          Even if my father knew how to send text messages, his fat, dry fingers can’t use the on screen keyboard.

    • eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wager some people want “dumbphones”. A phone you open and just dial into without scrolling through apps. A phone with a simple screen that doesn’t just gobble down battery life. So, like, a smartphone could fit this need with the right interfaces available.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, yeah, but that’s a different desire than this article is talking about because they’re more or less talking about flip phones.

  • jg1i@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The problem with dumb phones is that the entire world pushes people towards smartphones. For a lot of adults, it’s really hard to move to a dumb phone.

    Have a security system for your house? Need an app. Router? App. Bank? App. Payments? App. Doctor appointment check in? App. Texting? WhatsApp. Fucking menus? App. Refrigerator? Believe it or not, also App.

    My bank is so shitty that sometimes the website doesn’t work, but their mobile app does.

    You can’t always opt out of using an app. I tried setting up my new ISP’s router last week and it required an app. No other way to do it.

    Currently, I’m thinking something like the Jelly Star might be the best compromise. Has maps and other tools, but the tiny screen prevents them from trapping you.

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I want a phone that has an eink display but an ecosystem for apps. I want my battery to last weeks, I want my communications conduits to be dead simple, and I want to be able to run an OTP authenticator on it.

    If the thing I’m expected to have becomes highly useful for the things I’m expected to have it for while also interrupting my bad habit tendencies, I think it would be a good fit for me.

    • Someone64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      You can already buy those. They seem to commonly be referred to in online stores as ‘pocket wifi’. Just stick a sim card in them and you can manage their settings through any connected device with a web browser.

      • Dagamant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        You can’t use them as a phone though. And dumb phones that do somehow support tethering don’t do so at modern speeds.

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I had an LG and a Kyocera back in the day that could do that. They had some small non-connected games. Of course I couldn’t do much with the hotspot as this was on 3G.

  • grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not gonna lie, I do miss phones with tactile keyboard buttons. My last dumb phone had a mini qwerty keyboard and I loved that thing.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Absolutely. Sometimes I consider getting a separate Bluetooth keyboard, but I seriously doubt it would be similar enough to scratch the itch. I really miss knowing exactly where all the keys are by feel and typing without looking.

      • grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I do have Bluetooth keyboard for my current phone, but it’s definitely not the same, plus it’s just another thing to lug around

  • guacupado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    People don’t want dumb phones. They’re already available and no one buys them.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’d like a smart phone with the latest Android, a great camera, and a color e-ink display. I’ve yet to find one.

  • Glowstick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    As the actual headline itself says, this is a niche. The editorialized lemmy headline makes it sound like much more than that. Dumb phones still exist, but not many people choose to buy them