All smartphones, including iPhones, must have replaceable batteries by 2027 in the EU::undefined

  • mlfh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank fucking god for the EU, for fighting for global digital rights where nobody else does.

    • PlantbasedChe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have a fake economy. All investments, researching and efforts could be decided by state (we/public). Protecting society interests and not “investors” interests is an obligation

    • nostradiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One sensible right doesn’t overweight the never-ending bullshit coming from them.

      And imo this is not a sensible right. To change a battery in phones is easy even now. All you need is heat gun (hairdryer), new battery, phone tape (2$ ali) and 30 mins of your time…

      Also watter resistance will take a hit… I wouldn’t sink my phone under watter with detachable back cover even if it had ip68 by producer. They don’t even cover it in reclamation now.

      • SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Compare to how it used to be, removing the battery cover and replacing the battery on the fly. And water resistance with removable batteries has been and can be done. Stop with this nonsense.

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One sensible right doesn’t overweight the never-ending bullshit coming from them.

        True. Between the private healthcare, abortion rights, school shootings…

        Oh wait, you weren’t talking about the US?

    • Bogasse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love how higher IP rating is always the argument, it looks like everybody in this planet is doing daily deep diving and needs its smartphone to do that 😅

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We need SD cards more. They removed them so they can charge you 300 $ to upgrade 128gb and to force you into shitty cloud service.

      Again, just anti consumer bullshit spearheaded by Apple and gargled by Samsung.

    • FireWire400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be almost ready to say that we don’t need them any more if Bluetooth headphones were about 100x better and cheaper

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        At the same time, wired earphones/headphones are already just as good with a lot less parts/complexity.

        You don’t need batteries, radios, and chips for coding/decoding a signal coming out of a headphone jack. You can just plumb it straight into the speakers. No need to mess with controls and all of that, which would make them a lot cheaper.

      • cjthomp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still too much lag. I love my QC45s, but there’s still just enough lag to bother me

  • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s NOT just phones.

    It’s EVERYTHING with a battery. Including cars, laptops, e-bikes, video game controllers, headphones etc. (im not even sure if there are exceptions, such as tiny tiny “airpod” like things… ?)

    And they must be (with a few exceptions) replacable by a “layman”, without the use of special tools - which means no heat pads, to soften up glue etc etc. (and for gods sake, i hope it also means apple can’t hardwareID lock a battery)

    an exception mentioned in the EU document about the law says, high power batteries for example in an electric car, must be done by a profesional - but of course it still has to be “replacable” and not… tear the whole car apart and rebuild it using new batteries.

    replacable batteries in headphones, bluetooth mice, laptops etc, is gonna be awesome.

    and lets not forget, they have to recycle the old ones - and produce new batteries using recycled materials.

    in fact, i will try to hold on replacing my current (2 year old) phone, and wait to get one before 2027. Usually the battery turns to shit in 3ish years.

  • SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d say that’s fantastic news.

    Just waiting to see what’s going to go wrong between now and 2027 so that it won’t happen.

  • KrisND@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a bad idea but there are flaws and this also doesn’t seem to address the issue of pricing or availability.

    • So you can remove the battery, will you be able to buy one.
    • They could prevent 3rd parties from making batteries that work.
    • They could just not sell battery replacements.
    • They could add more parts needed, like seals, screws that strip too easily, that annoying sticky tape etc.
      • hydra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Back in 2014 you just bought a spare and replaced it, nowadays they all want to play the same bullshit games Apple innovated on. It was was about time an authority that ruled over a market with significant purchasing power made a decision against it.

      • KrisND@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Although I think it’s too expensive, this is why we need frame.work to make a phone too (or any company to do this). Great idea, good products, their markup just seems too high imo.

    • JGrffn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The neat thing about EU regulations is that they are iterated over constantly, so even if they don’t get it 100% right the first time, they’re able to nail things down in subsequent iterations. Look at how quickly they struck down any fantasies Apple had of still fucking people over with their own type c implementation fuckery. The direction the EU is taking is already doing plenty good for the entire world.

    • EmperorGormet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They could start selling tiers of battery quality which TBH sounds awful if they make the best battery life duration paywalled.

      • KrisND@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s possible. I’m more worried about a built in battery chip preventing users from sharing batteries, like once it’s installed, it’s activated and it’s locked to that device. Meaning you’d have to buy only from that manufacture and the price will be higher.

  • LakesLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Pesky EU throwing their weight around giving consumers more rights! --Brexiteer logic

    Oh well hopefully we’ll (UK) still benefit from it. Easier to design one phone than “EU” and “Rest of world” versions after all.

  • squidzorz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    A portable battery should be considered to be removable by the end-user when it can be removed with the use of commercially available tools and without requiring the use of specialised tools, unless they are provided free of charge, or proprietary tools, thermal energy or solvents to disassemble it. Commercially available tools are considered to be tools available on the market to all end users without the need for them to provide evidence of any proprietary rights and that can be used with no restriction, except health and safety-related restrictions.

    I’m glad they got specific. I wonder where Apple’s self-service battery replacement program falls under this? AFAIK it’s not free. They charge a fee to rent the specialized tools, which are also proprietary.

    This gives Apple a few choices:

    1. Make the tools commercially available, but at an astronomical price in typical Apple fashion
    2. Make the tools commercially available at a normal consumer price (unlikely)
    3. Make the self-service battery replacement program free (most likely, but will require a significant revision to the tools used since they are industrial-grade)
  • Squander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    EU is killing it right now. Charging port regulation and now removable batteries in everything. If companies are forced to produce different models for the EU maybe just maybe it will be cost effective to just make all their phones with removable batteries. One can hope, cause you know the US wont pass that type of consumer protection regulation.

  • Artificial Human No. 20@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I’m all for it if it means bringing back ridiculously sized phone batteries with huge bumps that can act as a finger shelf. My note 2 with a 4200mah battery was a beast in 2013.

    • anakin78z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Note 2 was my favorite phone. The replaceable back with the cover option was the best. Want your phone to look brand new? That’ll only cost $20.

      I never replaced the battery though.

  • Polymath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tried Ctrl+F searching to see whether anyone here had pasted the link to the law, and didn’t find anything, so I went to Presearch and found this, which appears to be the official European Union log for it, and has attached PDFs at the end with what seem to be the nitty-gritty for further reading…

    https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/07/10/council-adopts-new-regulation-on-batteries-and-waste-batteries/

    If I’ve found an errant page that just looks official, please link something better for those looking for the legalese

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think apple will comply by including a dongle battery that can be replaced but no one will actually carry with their phone

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The law says, “Designing portable batteries in appliances in such a way that consumers can themselves easily remove and replace them;”

      Key part being “in appliances”.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This needs to be true of notebooks too. I love my 2015 Macbook Air, but the battery lasts about five minutes and I use it way too much to take the time to get it replaced. Especially when it’s old enough to not be supported soon. But if I could just spend $50 and replace the battery myself without fucking things up, which I totally would as things stand now, I would be able to use it without keeping it plugged in all the time like I used to.