• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m sorry, why the fuck aren’t these street legal in more than half of the states? The article says something about safety, but these are street legal all over Europe where we have stronger safety regulations.

    Also there’s something I can’t put my finger on about the journalist choosing a hero image of the van losing its cargo.

    • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Speed restrictions.

      Kei trucks were designed for use in dense Japanese cities, which is why they also work in European cities. They are nimble but have a low top speed. You’re not going 70 mph around a street corner for instance.

      It would work in places like NYC for the same reasons, but remember that most of the USA is suburban or rural. You need vehicles that are capable of going fast if you’re going to get on a highway.

      A possible workaround is to have a separate class for these, like mopeds or scooters, which are road legal but are not highway legal.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        thats honestly a problem that can be solved with a small turbocharger and a slightly higher msrp, its not like they are ever getting close to the price of one of the huge ones.

    • MeatStiq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Here in the states we have legal corruption lobbyists which the auto manufacturers pay to keep cheap vehicles from being used. And then the lawmakers claim safety concerns as the reason.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They’re not really safe. They are generally front heavy, so there is a risk of rolling forward, no crumple zone safety stuff, more often than not the front suspension is under the seat and if that breaks it would shoot up into the cabin, and on top of everything they are pretty slow. They have more in common with an off road Polaris than a traditional truck, which is to be expected because they were mostly designed to be farm trucks. I’d much rather be in an older s10 than a kei truck in the event of a crash (and s10’s aren’t very safe). I think I lot of why they are so popular these days is because there aren’t really any light trucks anymore, and these are an alternative.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      They don’t meet the us safety standards. It could mean a lot of things like lacking 5mph bumpers, air bags, abs, etc.

      Doesn’t mean they aren’t safe.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Different crash standards in US and Europe. Most companies don’t even bother getting cars tested (designed?) in both because the market demands are so different.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      European road safety regulations are significantly weaker than those in the US and Canada.

  • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I would love a Kei truck, but I don’t live in a state where you can legally have one. That said I really think that if a Japanese manufacturer brought a barebones electric Kei to the American market they could make a killing because “people who want a truck but not a massive truck” is a totally unserved market segment.

    • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Kei trucks have the same, if not slightly bigger/smaller, bed size as a modern F-150. But they’re basically the size of Honda Fits.

      I’ve wanted one since I worked for USPS and learned to drive on the right side of a vehicle. My state does allow you to register them and drive them on the road, but alas, I cannot afford one. :(

      • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Kei trucks only can carry like 800 pounds. I run a bar and regularly take my pickup truck, a 2500, to its bed capacity of roughly 3000 lbs. I’ve had it sitting low just in empties before. A Kei truck can’t even haul my motorcycle if it breaks down. Now someone who’s a full time contractor, would call that thing useless, a farmer might buy one instead of a John Deere gator or side by side. It’d be suitable for golf course maintenance.

        • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah but most people don’t know what their bed capacity is and they never test it. Maybe something like the old Ranger is the optimal size truck for the average person, but our politicians wrote environmental standards which somehow incentivize making the biggest vehicles that can possibly fit on the road instead of making reasonably sized vehicles but with more efficient engines.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            It was a backlash to auto manufacturers classifying everything as a truck to get around emissions and fuel economy standards. The fucking PT Cruiser was a “truck” according to Chrysler.

            So they started classifying standards based on vehicle footprint with the idiotic hope that would make the manufacturers act better, but the manufacturers realized they could just make cars bigger every refresh cycle to stay ahead of CAFE.

          • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, a ranger would be ideal for a run around, could even tow my old camper, thing only weighs 3000 lbs. I’d just have to make more frequent beer runs of lesser amounts. At least a ranger can hold an old harley.

        • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yep, I’m a contractor, I would absolutely only own one to use for work if I had a big property, and it’d be groundskeeping. Just FYI though, Kei trucks are used as contractor/work trucks in Japan, as are Kei vans.

          But your average person’s Home Depot trip isn’t going to be close to what a contractor would use. And, just like what currently happens, if your vehicle can’t handle an outlying circumstance, you either rent one that can or have the materials delivered.

          So beyond work applications, and towing which most people don’t need the size vehicle they have for what they’re towing, modern pickup trucks are oversized and unnecessary for probably 95% of people.

          • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            ten sheets of 3/4 inch plywood is pushing the capacity of a Kei. That’s right in the middle of homeowner use.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    We desperately need smaller vehicles to counter the behemoth light trucks that are in the road today. Everything about these kei truck bans just scream corruption and incompetence from politicians to domestic auto manufacturers.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Americans just love being the biggest on the road. Bigger is better in their minds. Maybe we put an extra tax on very large vehicles.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        We need to require special licenses for those behemoths.

        I’d prefer they get banned entirely because there’s really no practical use for them that isn’t solved by some other commercial vehicle.

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          i’ve thought about that for high performance vehicles, but probably more important for very large vehicles. like a B/C license.

      • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’d love to see a comeback of vehicles like 1980s Toyota and Mazda pickups. Just a bit taller than sedans, good sized bed. I never understood the popularity of trucks that almost need a mini ladder to get into when they’re being used strictly in an urban or suburban setting.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Is there a reason for the ban related to how the car is built or designed, or is it politics?

          • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think any person who has a hand in making those laws would say it’s for safety. Though I also think many people looking at it and comparing it to other vehicles that are allowed would call it politics/corruption/stupidity. I personally think it’s politics

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      They stopped making Honda Fits (in North America) because there was no demand.

          • Kethal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            In a post about small light duty trucks, and a comment about small light duty trucks, you’re pointing out that compact sedans are not popular. Would you like to point out some other true but off topic things? Most sedans are two wheel drive. SUVs are the most popular body style.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              “No one is allowed to deviate at all in the slightest bit ever, to the obvious bigger topic!!!”

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s entirely irrelevant to bring up one specific type of vehicle being cancelled because people didn’t like it, which can be for a shitload of different reasons beyond just size

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reminder that due to the chicken tax, these vehicles have to be 25 years old before they can be imported.

    The big problem is, these vehicles were built to 30 year old safety standards - no vehicle from the 1990’s (except maybe a SAAB, and even then they’re not strong enough anymore and will fail a small offset frontal) can compete with a modern car in safety requirements.

    There is also the fact that these vehicles have been around for 25 years, and have that amount of age and wear on their platform - they won’t be as strong as they originally were off the production line.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      no vehicle from the 1990’s (except maybe a SAAB, and even then they’re not strong enough anymore and will fail a small offset frontal) can compete with a modern car in safety requirements.

      Americans keep building bigger trucks and raising speed limits, then bemoaning how small vehicles aren’t safe enough to survive an 80mph impact with a 10,000 pound vehicle.

      You think these Keis are dangerous? Try riding a bike.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thank god someone said it. This comment makes the most sense of any of the comments I’ve read so far.

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve wanted one of these for decades but the options are pay out the ass for import fees or buy a 30 year old model, neither fee great. Hate that my government is apparently dead set on all of us driving massive trucks and SUVs over realist vehicles

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hate that my government is apparently dead set on all of us driving massive trucks and SUVs spending thousands to money lenders, auto manufacturers, and dealerships over realist vehicles.

      Doubly so if those parties are campaign contributors. Always follow the money.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    What is the too small for road safety thing? That’s pure bullshit, right? Smart cars are legal, how can these not be?

    Give us cheap EVs and small trucks god damnit!!!

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      It might be more about what vehicles share the road. SUVs and pickups tend to cause the majority of fatalities in crashes because their bumper height basically being non compatible with cars and vans and their larger blindspots… That design might not play particularly well with the Keis in crash situations.

      But that being said SUVs and raised pickups are menaces to road safety across the board and we should be looking at phasing them out.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      They don’t pass US federal crash tests, probably because of the lack of crumple zone, so they can’t be imported until they’re 25 years old. Which doesn’t make them any safer, but I guess rules are rules:

      Because the trucks don’t meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, they’re legal to import only 25 years after having been manufactured. Then, it’s up to each state to decide whether to allow them on public roads.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    How’s my /keitruck subreddit doing? I got banned from reddit as a different username at the IP level so I have no clue. I was thinking about starting it again here on our own instance but it’s been a struggle with de-googlelizing my life at the moment. But maybe someone else has one already? Time to leave that rotten place behind.

  • Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d honestly love one of these, depending in if it’s powerful enough to haul a decently heavy load up a hill.

    I woodwork as a hobby, and have been wanting an old truck for a while, but the used truck market is pretty insane right now. All I want is an old beater with a reliable engine and a standard sized bed that’s capable of hauling sheet goods (4ft wide) without hassle.

    This would check those marks. If the price was right, I’d happily drive this little guy around.

    Instead, the market is full of ridiculously sized pickups with tiny truck beds because either the cab is huge, or they waste so much space making the truck look “tough” that the beds shrink narrower than 4ft.

    As long as I can get a small truck in a V6 so that I don’t stall out hauling something heavy like cement bags, I’m in.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you are in the US, look into minivans, or cargo vans. They are not popular here, so you’re not paying the pretty tax on them, and most vans with the rear seats removed can easily fit 4x8 plywood in the back. A beater van with a strong engine should be a lot cheaper than a beater pickup truck.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah, I used to borrow my parents van on occasion, but they got a newer model of the same van (Odyssey) that could no longer fit sheet goods.

        Also was pretty awkward tying the trunk door on the occasions where I needed longer material, which I would be doing more of nowadays. And TBH, despite my best efforts to pad things and load materials gently, I did scrap up the interior a bit, which wouldn’t be a factor with a truck.

        A work van might do, though. Those seem pretty huge.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I had a 2016 GMC Sierra. Cost $100 a week to take my son to daycare. Sold it and got a Sienna Hybrid and a classic truck for hauling shit. I hate all the technology in cars these days. My van tracks me and in the app it says “this feature can be disabled but the tracking will not stop” or to that affect. Garbage.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Man, I always thought the bigger SUVs looked like those oversized clown shoes, but the size comparison picture does drive home just how much dead air is in them.

  • Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Okay I want a broke down one of these, an crate electric motor, and a lifepo4 battery pack

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because there’s a market for functional, minimalist vehicles that do a job and don’t require 8 or more years of payments. Trucks have become status symbols more often than not.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    As much as overpaying sucks, that thing is just asking to get obliterated on an American road.