• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Apple has suspended work on the second-generation Vision Pro headset to singularly focus on a cheaper model

    That seems very reasonable and like what they probably should’ve been doing all along.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Bro, just one more year. Let them come up with just another pair of goggles bro, trust me bro, one more year and we will be in VR future bro.

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Quest 3 adoption is super high compared to where quest 1 or 2 were at years ago, the apple vision pro wasn’t meant to create mass adoption anyway, not at that price point.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Companies have been pushing VR so long now. I’ll say that I think the tech is cool and the idea is cool, but I will literally never use them.

    I can’t wear them while working as I am in meetings 99% of the time.

    I would not wear them in my free time, as I do not want to disassociate from my wife and cats.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I love VR. So I use it for gaming maybe once a week, for 1-2 hours, usually as an activity with my SO so we can switch who’s playing each “round” depending on the game. That’s the maximum I find fun instead of tiring. I can’t see using it for long periods or for work, that sounds like a nightmare.

    • Starkstruck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s absolutely phenomenal for gaming or vr “experiences” (basically movies made specifically for vr). But the corpos are really hellbent on making everyone use it for meetings for some fucking reason. Which is truly the lamest, most unnecessary use of this tech.

    • daddy32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Aren’t the meetings pushed as one of the basic function of these? But I guess it only makes sense if most of the participants use them and software has the support.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If most people have them? Ok, I’ll tell all my clients to get a pair 😂

    • kureta@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would only use VR in racing, flight sim, or space sim games. probably once a couple of months after the initial excitement.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s a good point. I’d have loved this for elite dangerous.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have found my headset useful for work, when working from home and I don’t do camera on meetings anyway.

      At home it’s pretty nice, and since my ears are open I can actually talk, so my wife actually prefers it over me wearing headphones. But all things in moderation, I wouldn’t wear it constantly.

      Despite being a huge fan of the concept, I still couldn’t go for Apple’s headset, it’s heavy, it’s expensive, and lack of controllers are all deal breakers. The Quest 3 is lighter, has good controllers, and is more affordable. It may not have the displays as nice as Vision, but that doesn’t make up for the rest of the stuff.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The current iterations have far more potential than the past.

      But the hardware is stil too power inefficiënt and the display pixel density is expensive to produce.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is this the virtual boy of Apple? A product that never really made no sense to anybody and was never really supported?

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was hoping they’d get the price down to something sane. It looks like it could be a cool tool for CAD. Of course there won’t be any input available from a non-Apple computer so I still wouldn’t want one.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I desperately want a virtual desktop environment for plain ass computing. Give me infinite windows for my spreadsheet and IDE and that’s all I need!

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ve heard the quest 3 is awesome and does almost everything the Vision does. Not sure I can justify the price to myself yet.

            • nutsack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              i am using a quest 2 for productivity and ebooks but the resolution is so low that my desktops need to be 1280x720 or I can’t read them. it will be nice to upgrade when i get the chance.

              • danc4498@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’ve heard the resolution is good enough to watch movies on too. Not sure if that is true, but that would be a selling point for me.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Without a Meta account tho? I’ve got hard blockers on price or shenanigans (or both) for every headset I know of.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          No.

          At 770,000 sold, it is Nintendo’s lowest-selling standalone console and the only one to have less than one million units sold, seconded by the Wii U’s 13.6 million units.

          The Wii U was seen as a complete and utter sales flop. The Wii U outsold the VirtualBoy 18:1.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why does this feel like another “voice assistant” that we’re supposed to talk to all day?

    If we worked from home, maaaayyybe voice control could be a thing once it’s 100%? But Boss Man wants us back at work. Are we really going to be a open-office with everyone talking to their computer like some sort of crypto bro boiler room?

    It’s sorta like the “video phone” that everyone was dying to have for decades. We finally got it and everyone went “meh”. A few grandparents use it to talk to their grandkids. Hell, most of the current generations don’t even use phones anymore.

    It’s one more technology that’s being pushed out before it’s baked and will likely be only really useful in niche applications. Really fucking good for those niche applications, but just too expensive and awkward for anyone else.

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, FaceTime. But how often do people use it in practice?

        Good point about Zoom. Business clearly like Zoom for meetings, but big business is still hammering BTO hard. Will Zoom be marginalized when they finally force in-person meetings?

        Also, the last few companies I worked for that did Zoom meetings, everyone kept their cameras off.

        • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not every day for everyone, but I used video calling every day to talk to my foreign spouse, and to talk to my little brothers when I was overseas. It’s pretty amazing overall.

        • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          My kid and his friends use FaceTime instead of calling and will often be on it for hours while gaming. It’s much easier than a call for 3+ people. We are in the US but I imagine they use whatsapp or whatever the same way other places.

          I work for a smaller org (less than 50 ppl) and we are generally required to have cameras on in meetings.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Apple should make a virtual headset you can buy in META, then put it on when you are already in a VR setting, except now you can use Apple services with it!

    That way it would have zero production cost, be absolutely as useless as it already is, and can be just as overpriced.

    It seems like the perfect Apple scheme.

    • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you can continue with vapid schemes that ensure endless shareholder value I’ll follow you anywhere senpaisano

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t know why everyone is so negative. The gameplan seems pretty clear to me.

    1. Make expensive fancy product. This is effectively a “devkit” that companies can use to start experimenting with AR software.
    2. Make lower cost product. There are now a few decent apps available and early adopters will be willing to buy it to be one the leading edge.
    3. Now there is a bigger market, leading more companies to be willing to develop apps.

    Apple is hoping that this is enough to break the chicken-and-egg cycle. Enough to get a few powerful apps such that more regular consumers will be willing to buy which again increases the addressable market which makes it more attractive to companies.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m not sure why they tried this.

    ‘We made a VR games headset, but replaced the games with office related programs, like calenders and notepads’

    Did any of them ever use an Oculus Quest? Like, why did they try this? Is this Apple’s Google Glass moment? Did they really think that if you pay enough youtubers to wear it in public, normal people would magically go into car-level debt to emulate them?

    In fact, I’ll go as far as to say this campaign and price point was a bigger mistake, and a louder failure than Google Glasses.

    • atocci@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t know how far things have come since the aptly named Acer AH101-D8EY, but that was the last time I tried to be “productive” in VR and it was absolutely not working.

  • Cossty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The only thing I could see myself using it for, is being in bed and watching a movie. I can do that with ar glasses for 300$.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The price immediately put this product into the grave. They should take out all the useless features like the eye passthrough, or the bizarre face scanning, if it’ll only ever be used for calls. If this were to be used in a gaming scenario, sort of like what the PSVR2 does, that’d be a whole different conversation

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If they can’t get the headset to fit the size and weight of swimming goggles, I don’t think it can get mass adoption

  • 555@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The front screen is what no one wants in a cheaper version. Don’t cut back on sound and cameras ffs

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I made the right choice back in 2019 when they were recruiting optimechanics experts. It’s a dumb idea.

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Good for sticking to something you believe in. Highly underrated quality in engineers. “Take the money and run like a thief” is such a bullshit attitude

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah the best jobs are all about doing something you like. The moment you stop caring much about being employed there, quality drops and your own reputation is on the line. It’s much better to do what you love. Getting paid 🤪 for it, that’s my wife’s job. She pushed me in the negotiation phase to the point where I was so uncomfortable. But now I feel like that was ok based on the change I brought to others in the company. My pay bump raised the pay for several others. But anyway, do what you love and get paid doing it, like Chris Rock said once…or twice while getting paid to say it.