• Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Another facet (at least specifically in America) is to de-stigmatize discussing personal income among the working class. We’ve been melt-brained hard to think it’s as private and taboo as discussing one’s most deep and darkest sexual kinks when really it’s just a tool of the owners to keep workers indentured in the wage-slave economy.

  • aski3252@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Or just oligarch or power addict. In the eyes of most people, wealth is about luxury, material goods and fancy toys. Of course that’s part of it, but at a certain point, wealth is no longer about luxury and toys, it’s about power and having control over resources everyone else depends on.

  • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    or oligarch, wait nvm how could i forget only the other has those, silly me how could i forget.

    • mihor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Indeed, there’s nothing inherently exceptional in billionaires wealth hoarders, according to many studies of this phenomenon. They are literally just lucky enough that they managed to get their hands on such a ludicrous amount of money, they really aren’t anything special.

  • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sometimes I use the term “psychopathic hoarder class” when referring to this group of people.

  • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I think it isn’t going to be that effective a phrase. People don’t understand why having lots of money (hoarding wealth) is a bad thing, necessarily, and it sort of implies that, if they were to just spend it it’d make the initial hoarding fine.

    Gotta also focus on the fact that they essentially stole that money from workers through labor exploitation. The bare fact that they got the money to begin with is the problem, not just them holding onto it. If they were to spend it all on horrible capitalist enterprises rather than hoarding it, that’d be even worse. Even if they spent it all on “philanthropic” efforts, that’s still worse than the workers having their fair share and the government being able to actually have that money to spend on social programs through taxes.

  • 10_0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Someone I strive to be, more money for the money pit, more food for the fridge, more education for my kids, more opportunities for the family, more money for charity

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reporter: [REACTED]
    Reason: Not a meme

    Arguably true. Please post actual memes next time, OP.