• notfromhere@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Not to mention their “1080p” streams look worse than 2013 480p streams. The site is a dumpster fire.

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Good thing we have Youtube alternatives. The two biggest ones are Odysee & Rumble. Also we have Peertube. The problem with Peertube is people don’t use it. So it haves less content on it.

    If you’re going to watch Youtube, use a Frontend. For same reason Privacy Guides don’t have Grayjay on it.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    It’s already really difficult to engage with the content you want to see, but now they’re also taking away the only immediately noticeable metric of a successful video? Genuinely just why

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      They removed the star system a long time ago. They removed the down votes again a few years back.

      They want their algorithm to be the only thing that decides whether you watch a video or not.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        That’ll work excellent for all those people trying to find tutorial videos for ‘XYZ’ when you have no verification data to determine whether it’s even a legit tutorial.

        • calabast@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          People who watch tutorial videos only get on, watch the video and then leave. How are they supposed to make tons of advertising revenue from that? No, we must sacrifice that class of video from the platform, in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            I mean you joke, but they’re literally doing that to reaction video channels. MXRPlays had his entire channel deleted, despite having millions of subscribers. It was clear for years that someone at youtube had a grudge against them.

            Especially since they deleted their channel. Gave strikes to all their videos, and took the videos down. Buuuuuuut, someone ELSE illegally reuploaded their content, and they can’t even report the video because their channel is deleted. The illegal re-uploads have no strikes, no issues, the content stay up, and some OTHER person makes money off of MXRPlays years old content.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Hmm at a glance I dont see a major issue here, my concern would be that I dont click on vids with shit numbers so they are now on a more equal footing.

    But it is better for people not to be so focused on numbers like removing number of likes on Instagram.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I don’t know what’s up with the algorithm pushing these lately. If it’s a video with 4 views from a channel with no subscribers I’m probably not interested in it. Sometimes they have a good thumbnail/title so I give them a chance but 9/10 times it’s terrible. Also often extremely right wing for whatever reason.