New research reveals serious privacy flaws in the data practices of new internet connected cars in Australia. It’s yet another reason why we need urgent reform of privacy laws.

Modern cars are increasingly equipped with internet-enabled features. Your “connected car” might automatically detect an accident and call emergency services, or send a notification if a child is left in the back seat.

But connected cars are also sophisticated surveillance devices. The data they collect can create a highly revealing picture of each driver. If this data is misused, it can result in privacy and security threats.

A report published today analysed the privacy terms from 15 of the most popular new car brands that sell connected cars in Australia.

This analysis uncovered concerning practices. There are enormous obstacles for consumers who want to find and understand the privacy terms. Some brands also make inaccurate claims that certain information is not “personal information”, implying the Privacy Act doesn’t apply to that data.

Some companies are also repurposing personal information for “marketing” or “research”, and sharing data with third parties.

  • sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You gotta love that there are benchmark for that… The company that can’t even get free, right.

    I really like their Amazon reviews thing that they bought… I bet the shady dude that had all the fucking people finder sites was in charge of that cause it’s got the same kind of fucking cheesy-graphic-load-screen… basically, the only functional piece of software they had at that point cause they hadn’t touched it, and then they went an AIed it up…

    Here’s a new idea, why doesn’t everybody in the fediverse post their favorite privacy enhanced Firefox rebrand:

    • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m really confused by your comment and it seems like you’re assuming everyone knows what you’re talking about already. Could you provide some context?

      What about “Free” are they getting wrong? (I’m assuming you’re talking about Mozilla here?).

      What Amazon reviews thing? Who was this “shady dude”, what did he do that was so “shady”, and how does that relate to Some Amazon review thing if you’re not even sure that he was behind it to begin with?

      What does “Aled it up” mean?

      • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The Amazon reviews thing I assume is referring to Fakespot, which Mozilla bought some time ago.

        But I’m confused about their “AI’ed it up” comment because from the very beginning Fakespot was using ML to determine the tone of reviews and whether or not they were lying about the product/paid reviews by the seller.