That might be what was supposed to happen, but when I started up the VMs I saw memory contention.

That’s why I gave up on Plex. I couldn’t get it to play over Chromecast reliably and it kept forgetting my media library information. I haven’t had those issues with Jellyfin.

They just turn it off with group policy or intune.

The only required parameter is the appid, which is in the page URL. I don’t really know what the other IDs are, but you can mess around and see if it works.

It doesn’t look like a real product to me.

I have four 6tb data drives and 32gb of RAM. When I set them up with zfs, it claimed quite a few gb of RAM for its cache. I tried allocating some of the other NVMe drive as cache, and tried to reduce RAM usage to reasonable levels, but like I said, I found that I was spending a lot of time fiddling instead of just configuring RAID and have it running just fine in much less time.

Meh. I run proxmox and other boot drives on ext4, data drives on xfs. I don’t have any need for additional features in btrfs. Shrinking would be nice, so maybe someday I’ll use ext4 for data too.

I started with zfs instead of RAID, but I found I spent way too much time trying to manage RAM and tuning it, whereas I could just configure RAID 10 once and be done with it. The performance differences are insignificant, since most of the work it does happens in the background.

You can benchmark them if you care about performance. You can find plenty of discussion by googling “ext vs xfs vs btrfs” or whichever ones you’re considering. They haven’t changed that much in the past few years.

Nope. The content is served through Steam, not on the page. You’ll have to find someone who mirrored it if it’s been taken down.

Edit: however, if it’s still available in the Steam CDN system, you may still be able to download it with a tool like this: https://github.com/SteamRE/DepotDownloader

Does it not do dkms?

They don’t get clicks.

It’s a simple question with a simple answer, and one that’s been asked and answered repeatedly. But I don’t think it’s a dumb question, which is why I answered it with a sufficient answer.

Sonarr, public trackers, usenet

Nobody would have been looking directly at the source data. The FBI or whoever provides the dataset to approved groups, but after that you just say “use all the images in this folder” and it goes. But I don’t even know if they actually provide real full-resolution images, or just perceptual hashes, or downsampled images.

And while it’s possible to use the dataset to generate new images assuming the training data had full-res images, like I said, I know they investigate the people making the request before allowing access. And access is probably supervised and audited.

And it saves them on bandwidth costs!

You saw some weird shit and decided to subject us to it too? Why?

For reasonable people. For others, it’s an avenue to get away with war crimes.

I’m a stickler for content appropriateness, but even I can see how a game company’s gaming console is related to gaming.

Never? They were very clear about the first captchas being used to train OCR, way back in like 2010.

No, only when it follows ChatGPT’s response formula.

Then just say “something” not “someone” if you’re talking about things and not people. There’s no need to create unnecessary problems.