Yes, a Pigeon is Faster for Data Transfer than Gigabit Fiber Internet::A decade ago, a pigeon with a 4 GB memory stick outran an ISP’s ADSL service. A 2023 rematch features a bird with 3 TB of flash drives vs gigabit internet.

  • idunnololz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not the original author:

    Trebuchets are the most technologically advanced siege engines of all time, and are capable of hurling a 90kg stone over 300m using a counterweight.

    With this in mind, we can perform the following calculations:

    A 22TB WD Red Pro drive weighs 670g, with a maximum hurl weight of 90kg, trebuchet can hurl 134 drives at once, totalling 2,948 TB of data.

    The average speed of a trebuchet projectile is 54m/s and the average size of an American ‘block’ is 100m. Lets presume 3 blocks to get our full trebuchets use (fuck you catapults).

    It’ll take 5.5 seconds for the projectile to go from launch to dramatic landing, meaning a throughput of 536TB a second.

    Therefore, trebuchets are the best transfer method.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good ole sneakernet. It’s hard to have dropped packets when they’re delivered by hand

      • c10l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not. Just drop the storage device in a manhole, or get mugged, or break it in some way. Also when you do so, pretty much all packets are lost and to retransmit you need to go back to the point of origin and make a new copy, assuming you still have the original.

  • CazRaX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t help but think that they are rigging this for the bird. Just calculate how long it takes the bird to get from here to there and then pick a capacity that takes longer to download.

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes and no.

      If you could put a 1 petabyte flash drive on a pigeon, it would easily crush the gigabit internet

      Does a 1 petabyte flash drive exist? Could it exist?

      They put 3 stripped-down terabyte flash drives on the pigeon. Could it carry more weight?

      You get to the point where the pigeon can’t carry the weight.

      All this is saying that sending data by pigeon can be faster and using 3 tb sticks proves it.

      If it needed to be 4 tb, then they would have had to use 4 sticks. If it couldn’t carry 4 sticks, then you have your answer that the pigeon can’t do it with current technology.

  • devbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    its like they choose 3 TB because they knew it was the smallest amount that would lose. lets make it a real re-match and go back to transfering 4 GB.

      • devbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        i guess im confused why 3 TB was chossen. what is this representing. Most people are not transfering 3 TB on a regular basis, 100 GB is a large transfer for common cases. who is this information for? who should be looking into pigeons/jets for regular multi-TB data transfers. just sounds like pigeon propaganda to me.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          birds arent real is leaking… Neat :D

          Most people are not transfering 3 TB on a regular basis

          The usual Joe? Yep.
          Off site backup is usually out of question except for datahoarders and businesses. But they might benefit from it.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a classic example in education to demonstrate the difference between bandwidth and latency. Extremely high bandwidth, but also extremely high latency. It’s not for practical use, it’s a thought experiment to explain something that’s often counterintuitive to students that are just starting out learning about networking.

  • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I once signed up for a cloud backup service that would mail out a HDD so the user could backup to that, mail it to them, seed the data on the backup servers, and then let the user start doing incremental backups. FedEx, round trip, was faster than uploading it all over the network.

    • Piers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t remember who (probably all of them) but one of the fang companies offers a service where they’ll send you a truck with a huge backup server in a shipping container to do an on site backup to drive back to their cloud servers (for similar reasons.)

  • pontata@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is the time of loading and downloading the files from the flash drives of the pigeon included?

  • BustinJiber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can carry way more HDDs than that weakass stupid pigeon. So what I can’t run to save my life.

    Isn’t gigabit internet more about amounts of data you can transfer rather than the overt speed that is not important to average user?