I thought the same as you did before coming in here thinking the headline was fine but reading some other comments I can see their point of view. Different people just see different things, it’s all just perspective. You’ve really gone on an unhealthy crusade in here demanding everyone see your side and that it’s the only valid one.
I can understand sensitivity to potentially troubling interpretations of a phrase, however:
I hope that all of that negative shit condenses itself into the world’s most pristine Lego that haunts whoever came up with that tone and headline
This is more than “oh some folks might have a reading other than intended” it’s demonizing someone for writing a headline that almost certainly intended no ill will. That seems really unfair to the headline writer.
I thought the same as you did before coming in here thinking the headline was fine but reading some other comments I can see their point of view. Different people just see different things, it’s all just perspective. You’ve really gone on an unhealthy crusade in here demanding everyone see your side and that it’s the only valid one.
I can understand sensitivity to potentially troubling interpretations of a phrase, however:
This is more than “oh some folks might have a reading other than intended” it’s demonizing someone for writing a headline that almost certainly intended no ill will. That seems really unfair to the headline writer.