• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        I said, “indicative of”, not, “yea you’re insecure”. Amazing how you children cannot parse basic perception from accusation.

    • MySwellMojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, I wouldn’t want to deal with the mental gymnastics involved with my significant other getting down with other people

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        An open relationship isn’t that weird of a concept to some. It’s about how much others mean to you, not how much of them you posess. People in these comments are fucking pathetic for not understanding this basic fact of healthy relationships: You do not own anyone else. To any degree. Period.

        • MySwellMojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          No ownership, but sharing time. I want to buy a house not a time-share. I want that deep emotional connection with someone. I don’t have the capacity to have more than one deep connection and would like someone similar. If my partner chooses they want something open, that’s fine, but we would transition to friends

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ha, C&E are actually relationship needs of mine, friend.

      In fact, I think the others are more indicative of my insecurities, but hey, I’m not anxious-avoidant so I don’t know for sure.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If you’re dealing with the boundaries healthily, then it’s not so much an insecurity and more of a limitation. If others are aware and OK with it, I’d call that healthily dealt with. Whether or not the limitation is a problem is merely a matter of preference, and luckily it sounds like yours line up.

        I love how everyone assumes “indicative of” is a direct accusation… As if false red flags based on perception do not exist. People are so small minded.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Im someone for whom C is a necessity like the person you’re responding too and I think you’re 100% right.

      It may not be a nessesarily pathological insecurity, but it absolutely is an insecurity.

      If I felt more secure I’d probably be able to deal with it. I don’t think that means im a necessarily insecure person, or am someone for whom insecurity is a clinical problem, but at least comparatively that makes it an insecurity.

      You can get depressed and not have depression, you can get insecure and not be an insecure person, heck you can even maintain a healthy amount of anxiety. These are essentially just human traits and there’s no shame in admitting that I have a trait that’s at least a little rooted in insecurity so long as it doesn’t negatively impact my life.