IBM to Managers: Move Near an Office or Leave Company::International Business Machines Corp. delivered a companywide ultimatum to managers who are still working remotely: move near an office or leave the company.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s the intent - it’s a layoff in disguise, with a discount on the severance package.

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    10 months ago

    They asked nicely. Then they abruptly started threatening termination. Keep in mind this is after they had to close a few offices when the regular employee RTO mandate resulted in a large amount of attrition.

    So now there are people with 120+ mile round trip commutes because they live within the cutoff distance. Nearly all meetings are video calls anyway due to team members being scattered all over the world. When folks asked leadership why in a company-wide meeting months ago they basically said to suck it up.

    This has morale pretty low, when it was already terrible even for folks that prefer in-person and live close. Some quit after the announcement. The brain drain is already causing an impact because there’s so much tribal knowledge and teams are silo’d as hell.

    Never seen a company so out of touch or be so openly hostile to their workers. It’s just wild.

    • yggdar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are very busy charging an arm and a leg for crappy software with shit support.

    • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’re still a big name in mainframes and are also a cloud hyperscaler, and they offer software development and consulting. They do a lot of research in AI and quantum computing, and even blockchain a few years ago. But altogether just a shadow of what they once were. I used to work there when Lenovo took over ThinkPad production and the hard drive business was phasing out. I couldn’t imagine being there now.

      • Dlayknee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        cloud hyperscaler

        I know you’re technically right, but their “cloud” is the weirdest offering I have ever seen

  • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Step 1: Enforce RTO mandates Step 2: Fire remote employees Step 3: Replace the fired folks with remote job positions, paying 10%-15% less.

    • Im_old@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or not even hire replacements, so they cut workforce AND don’t have to pay severance packages. Costs are reduced, earning are higher, shareholder are happy. Yes, it’s a relatively short term plan, but that’s what analysts and investors care about, short term returns.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    IBM amplified the death and destruction of the holocaust by assisting the nazis with a more efficient process to find Jewish people.

    The Nazis made extensive use of Hollerith punch card and alphabetical accounting equipment and IBM’s majority-owned German subsidiary, Deutsche Hollerith Maschinen GmbH (Dehomag), supplied this equipment from the early 1930s. This equipment was critical to Nazi efforts to categorize citizens of both Germany and other nations that fell under Nazi control through ongoing censuses. This census data was used to facilitate the round-up of Jews and other targeted groups, and to catalog their movements through the machinery of the Holocaust, including internment in the concentration camps. Nazi concentration camps operated a Hollerith department called Hollerith Abteilung, which had IBM machines, including calculating and sorting machines.

    The guy that ran the company through this period was named Watson - their AI offering today is named after him… the guy that greenlit the nazi stuff - This world is a fucking joke.

    • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

      IBM Watson is a computer system capable of answering questions posed in natural language. It was developed in IBM’s DeepQA project by a research team led by principal investigator David Ferrucci. Watson was named after IBM’s founder and first CEO, industrialist Thomas J. Watson. The computer system was initially developed to answer questions on the quiz show Jeopardy!

      to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about

  • erwan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    So they have to move to an office, any office?

    Meaning they can no longer be remote but don’t have to be in the same office as the people they manage?

    That makes a lot of sense.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is similar to what most tech companies have aligned on. I work 200 miles from my co-workers, my manager is 100 miles away, and while I’m supposed to be 100 miles away our tracking software doesn’t care if I badge in 2 miles away at my local office.

      If you’re a multinational company, you’ll be on video calls regardless of what you do, so it’s fucking stupid that they enforce these rules.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Cool, are they going to pay more, so people can move closer to the urban area where these offices presumably are? No? Then fuck off.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because we’d lose our jobs long before voting on a union. No way they’d care about the very tiny risk of very tiny fines as opposed to the huge cuts in wages to IT workers that have been made over the last decade and continue to be made.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Okay sure, but you do understand that’s a risk witb every corpo, right? Anything big enough can shrug off fines. Worker protections by the government aren’t what allows unions to exist, they were pushed for by already existing unions. The real strength is in numbers. They literally cannot fire all of us, or even 90% of us.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “Why are we spending so much on data security and oversight?”

    “What…? What the fuck are you asking…? Those are integral for our work.”

    “Can we reduce the need for added security measures by putting a physical layer in place? Like in the old days.”

    “No? Especially not while everybody works from home, ha ha ha… ha…”

    “…”

    “…”