“In 10 years, computers will be doing this a million times faster.” The head of Nvidia does not believe that there is a need to invest trillions of dollars in the production of chips for AI::Despite the fact that Nvidia is now almost the main beneficiary of the growing interest in AI, the head of the company, Jensen Huang, does not believe that

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    It depends what you call AI.

    True artificial intelligence likely requires quantum computing because there’s some quantum stuff happening our brains and probably the smartest living human (Sir Roger Penrose) thinks that’s where the secret to consciousness is hiding after spending the last couple decades investigating that after helping Hawking finish up Einstein’s work

    If you just mean a chat bot that can pass the Turing test, then yeah we can just wait a decade instead of developing special tech for AI.

    I mean, if we really develop artificial intelligence before we understand our own consciousness, we’re probably fucked anyways.

    It’d be like somehow inventing a nuclear bomb before understanding what radiation was. We’d have no idea what we’re creating or what the consequences of flipping the switch would be.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Roger Penrose is a mathematician who made important contributions to theoretical physics in the 1960ies, for which he received a Nobel Prize. In later decades, he published speculative books on consciousness, quantum physics, and neurobiology. These ideas have been out there for about 30 years now but have not been able to convince scientists in general. Rather, they are generally considered implausible or outright contradicted by the evidence. Simply put: It’s wrong.

      The idea that quantum physics plays a direct role in brain function is very much on the fringes of science.

      No offense meant. I know these ideas are very important to many spiritual people, but I felt the casual reader should know that it is not important in science.

    • NOSin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Do you know if there are, or if there are plans for a “new” Turing test ?

      • jackalope@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        The turing test is a rhetorical tool by turing to outline his logical positivist beliefs. Turing did believe in its use as an actual test but it’s not a discrete test, it’s a test of hypothetically infinite time.