Online vape seller has ‘no intention of stopping’ shipments to Australia, despite nationwide ban — ‘We have no intention of stopping just because of one twat in Canberra.’::The New Zealand-based seller issued a notice to its Australian customers that shipments will continue regardless of the government’s vape reform.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    No, do not leave vaping alone. Just because some asshat companiea found a new way to exploit health damage for profit does not mean it should be allowed because freedumb.

    • deranger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Let me consume nicotine in the least harmful method available. You don’t get to dictate what I do with my body. That includes all drugs.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        You mean nicotine gum? Or nicotine patches right? Because those are still legal.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Sure, but can we then tax the product for the actual health risk?

        And least damaging? How about gum, or tabs. No popcorn lung involved.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Abortion is bad for the fetus’s health. Perhaps we should tax it 1000%. While we are at it let’s tax Soda and Sugar. Fuck it lets tax cosmetic surgery, I mean it is such a waste and so risky.

          If we are going to go down this road of controlling other people’s bodies let’s go all the way then.

          • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sugar is already being taxed, and this will grow. High fructose should be extra taxed yes. Abortion seems out of place in your rabid “muh freedumbs” response.

            There is a responsibility for a government to protect the health of citizens. I can see this (and drugs) being properly regulated. And then people can buy and use as they see fit. But just free sales, no.

            • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Well I’m glad you are there to dictate what someone can and can’t do with their body. We only want people to engage in activities if they are state sanctioned.

              • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                As an alternative, government regulates all sorts of things. Alcohol, gambling, cigarettes, firearms.

                The government is the counterweight to corporations abusing people that might not be able to resist and the VERY negative societal impacts this has.

                The fact you think this is unnecessary makes you very fortunate that you never had to deal with the negative externalities of these companies.

            • deranger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t agree with those taxes. People are free to do with their body what they want, provided it’s not harmful to others. This is not the responsibility of the government.

              Providing education so people can make informed decisions about the risks of the behaviors they engage in - now that’s a government (and parental) responsibility.

              • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yeah, same as with vaccination. Your decisions influence a lot of others.

                Even if the government properly informs people, not everyone is able to make an informed decision.

                Private companies abusing the system and hurting many people along the way is not something that should be celebrated as freedom. And this is a perfect example of that. Health, the environment everything can be sacrificed in the name of profit.

                • deranger@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Vaccines are not a personal freedom just like shitting in the creek behind your house isn’t a personal freedom. Those decisions create public health nightmares. I don’t think people should be allowed to smoke or vape in public where it could affect others, but what people do in their own time is their own business.