• underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I cannot conceive of a task where a humanoid robot would be better suited than just a robot built for the task without trying to mimic a human form.

    • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      Minimal investment. A purpose-built robotic production line is incredibly expensive and can onl- do what it was designed for. Theoretically, using these robots requires no alterations to the existing facilities, allowing mercedes to trial them with very low risk and comparably low losses if things don’t work out.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        wouldnt it make more sense to do a trial that tests their supposed advantages over purpose built robots rather than one which decidedly does not

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Mercedes also better support UBI so that these workers who will lose their jobs to automation don’t starve to death.

  • pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This really sucks for many disabled people who rely on ‘low skill, repetitive’ jobs to survive. I hope Mercedes addresses this (I doubt, given how capitalists hate disabled people).