• solarvector@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    How is this itself not a fake argument?

    The arguments in support of tick-tock are a bizarre amalgamation of just about every category of bad faith argument. I haven’t seen one that suggests tick-tock it’s actually a net benefit.

    • redempt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      it’s not that tiktok is good, it’s that banning it sets a bad precedent and will be used to justify further control and censorship of the internet

      • zovits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m all for setting a precedent if it’s about banning chinese spyware and propaganda weapons.

      • solarvector@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s a much better argument than what’s presented in this meme. There’s at least an argument to claim that the difference is about curtailing foreign interest through ownership. Ownership does heavily influence a platform. Unfortunately that hasn’t prevented Murdock from owning more formal messaging platforms.

        On a side note, how do you feel about a handful of corporations controlling and censoring the Internet?