Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists’ permission. And that’s without getting into AI’s negative drag on the environment.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Brief description = book

      TIL

      Imagine if anyone who commissioned a piece of artwork took sole credit for that art.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      All it takes to write a book is to string some words together?

      Flagpole masonry tick Persepolis a reciprocity.

      I’m an author!

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        You are. A crappy one, but you’re an author. Try to do better.

        Gatekeeping words like “artist” and “author” is very nasty. My 3 year old makes art. He’s bad at it but if I tell him he’s not an artist he’ll stop and who knows what could have happened. I choose to encourage him.

        He also write like you did. And I encourage him to do better.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t think saying “if you put random words together with no context, you’re not an author” is gatekeeping. It’s defining a term.

          And I absolutely gatekeep the idea that anyone’s three-year-old is an artist or an author. Those are things that take skill.

          • hansl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            My friend always said “if you can’t see it live with instruments it’s not music and they’re not musicians” and I disagreed with that for the same reason I disagree with you saying making art takes skills. I hope that makes sense. Making good art and popular art might take skill, but anyone can be an artist, anyone can be an author. “Anyone can cook.”

            We can agree to disagree.

              • hansl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Sure, why not. Art teachers always defined art as the expression of an idea, and playing the saxophone for the first time is definitely that. Talent, time, skill and knowledge does not enter in this label as far as I’m concerned.

                Now you’re not John Zorn but, hey, maybe you’ll be later with some perseverance and dedication. Edit: Or maybe you’ll become Duke Silver and you’ll be happy enough doing that. We need both in the world.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I disagree with the other poster, I’d say your child is an artist making maybe the purest form of art in the world, taking their life experience and putting it to paper. I’d dare to say that letting them type out a random prompt and getting a decent image out of their limited vocabulary would be much less impactful than the most crude stick figure drawing of the two of you together.