• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Me watching WWDC: “Android already does that.”

    Me watching Google I/O “iOS already does that.”

  • jay9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    I didn’t realise android did free SMS over satellite when there is no cellular connection

  • Ballistic_86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s great! Competition in this space is working to improve both.

    Instead of this stupid fanboy shit of Android vs iOS, we should celebrate an actual success in development.

  • superterran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good for Android, now if they’d only implement all of the Apple-only features that create the lock-in appeal then maybe they’ll get somewhere. When my Pixel Buds flow seamlessly from device to device to the third and fourth device then maybe we’ll talk

    • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have the Pixel Buds Pro and they kinda do that, but yeah not very well. I have them paired to my phone and my laptop, and sometimes randomly they’ll silently disconnect from my laptop and permanently pause whatever I was watching if my phone plays a notification. I can’t fix it until I disconnect from and reconnect to my laptop multiple times.

      One time I was watching a video on my laptop and they randomly connected to my desktop! I hadn’t used them on my desktop in at least a year, until then!

      All in all, they can flow seamlessly, but it’s 60/40 on if it works properly

      At least the noise cancelling and passthrough are fun to mess with

      • superterran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        How many devices do you switch between? For me, it’s phone, tablet, two laptops and my watch. I think that the Pixel Buds can switch between two without needing a re-pair. Meanwhile, I can stream my Apple TV audio to my AirPods as they’re also an audio source! Even if Google released basic support for this today, they still wouldn’t be able to fully catch up because they have no truly realized desktop/laptop OS so I’d live in a mixed ecosystem.

        • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I have them paired to a few things, but only ever use them on my phone and laptop. That’s why I was so confused when it connected to my desktop, since it was last paired and actually used a long time ago.

          I guess it’s a complicated issue for me, since they’re paired with more than 2 things but only ever connected to 2 things

    • danielfgom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly. Also memoji on Android would be nice as well as the better emoji content on iPhones…

      The bedtime mode on iPhone is also very cool as well as the ability to set your contact photo which other iPhone users will see when they call you.

      Plus I think Apple have done a better job with widgets because they look nicer and are stackable.

      Imo as an android user, android has been neglected by Google for a while and apart from Samsung no other OEM’s are adding for software to rival Apple.

      Which is one of many reasons why I’ll be switching back to iPhone. I see more and better user features being added to iOS.

      The only thing Google has done with android lately is Material You, and it’s not as rich as apples customisation. And circle to search is a stupid feature which only benefits Google more than the user.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Presumably need Pixel everything for that but even then, as an android user I would rather be locked into an Apple eco than google.

      • superterran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        My SO has current gen Pixel devices all around and it’s yet to materialize. To my mind, Google could sync Bluetooth pairing info across all Android devices if they put their minds to it. But even if they did, they would need to work with Microsoft and other vendors to get the kind of ambiguity that would compete with Apple’s product line. As it stands, if you buy the Apple product you get the best hardware and the software compliment is five years ahead than the competition. Google and Microsoft need to leapfrog

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean Android, and Samsung in particular, borrow from Apple all the time as well. Hell Samsung frequently bad mouths Apples for the anti-consumer choices one year then follows suit and does the same thing in a year or 2 themselves.

    These kinds of takes are not the flex some seem to think they are in my opinion.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      So what you’re saying is, if you want advanced phone features sooner buy an Android, if you want to be subjected to dodgy business practices sooner buy an Apple

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah remember when Samsung charged you double?

      No ?

      Yeah me neither.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Eh? Their bog standard device cost is usually pretty on par. And Apple definitely isn’t charging you double.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Which one is bog standard? Samsung has over 12 different models on production that range from 150$ to 1900$, including two models with folding screens. Apple has 3 4 almost identical phones, they’re all overpriced hardware.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            The hardware is overpriced, absolutely. But it’s also typically better than Samsung.

            By big standard I mean their “low end” device. The comparable Samsung of each generation is usually within ~$200 of the Apple model.

            • miridius@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Better? The Apple hardware is always significantly worse than competition in the same price class. Most of the price of an iPhone goes to their excessive marketing and record profits, so they have to cut costs on hardware

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              You mean to say that the accidentally bendy phone is better than the actually foldable phone? Or that the accidentally bendy tablet is better than the tablet that is almost 20% larger, equally thin but somehow doesn’t bend?

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    To be honest as an Android user, if Apple makes their phone less locked down and give more affordable choices for phones I may try an iPhone, as I am a bit fed up with Android, and there are no other real alternatives.

    • danielfgom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can’t afford a new one so I’m looking at used IPhone’s to get. Because Apple tends to support them for 5+ years, I still should get at least 2 years OS updates with a used one.

      I’m thinking iPhone 13 is a good one to get.

    • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      iPhone SE is their affordable line. Don’t see that changing anytime soon as it sells well.

      • Matriks404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        It still costs nearly as much as minimal wage in my country (OK, ~$200 USD less), I am not going to buy it anytime soon.

  • miridius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    And yet still no back button, the most basic feature that iPhones sorely lack :(

  • Cornpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ok. And android still sucks compared to Apple. Always full of bloatware and can never get updated or long term support. Only the Google phones have a decent OS

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is a ridiculous take. You can change any of that in Android easily, Apple locks you into BS without extreme measures

  • ulkesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Yep, and Android also suffers from plenty of malware within the Play Store. I’d rather a company focus on combating that than worrying so much about minor features.

    Edit> Yeah I figured I would be downvoted. People are very tribal and base their identity on such which means they will disagree with me. I am a pragmatist and don’t want to deal with malware and a shitshow of fragmentation — so while it does suck to be within Apple’s walled garden, it at least fits my needs.