• SymphonicResonance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually didn’t care when there was an ad in the beginning of the video or what not. It was when I had to start watching multiple ads in the middle of a 10 minute video as well. Like come on, not even broadcast TV is that annoying.

    • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shorts are such a stupidly blatant way to start showing more ads than content, and they make navigating channels impossible. Hell you can’t even get away from ads in search results with premium.

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Noaw I understand why so many people hate shorts! I never use the official app or browser to watch, so I don’t see the advertisements.

    • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. I was listening to a beautiful violin piece being played by a soloist and an ad interrupted it. I would be fine with watching the ad before. I immediately went and watched it elsewhere.

      Later, I came back to YouTube for something unrelated and had a message/popup that said ‘tired of being interrupted? Upgrade to premium here!’

      They know exactly what they are doing, trying to make it unbearable to use anything other than premium. They can get fucked.

    • whileloop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If I understand correctly, there’s nothing about Firefox that makes ad blockers any harder to detect. What can Firefox and uBlock do to stop Google from blocking adblock users on the site?

      That said, I use Firefox and uBlock myself, and I’ve yet to see YouTube stop me from using the site.

      • AProfessional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t care about Firefox. Chrome is the browser market, they have weakened extensions, they implemented DRM, and here we are.

      • AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t matter if YouTube can detect uBlock. The great thing about uBlock is you can just block the anti-adblock script. Since Javascript is executed on the user’s computer, it’s trivial to just tell your computer to ignore it. And moving it to server side would cost them too much money in processing power.

        That’s why they want everyone to adopt their DRM, so they don’t have to worry about it.

      • Goodie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox currently enjoys protection from being “relatively niche” in the browser market (aka not Chromium based trash).

        But if I had to place a bet on which browser would put effort in to protecting your privacy, including which extensions are installed, my bet would be on Firefox over Chrome.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference is Firefox is not a chromium based browser and thus not subject to googles fucking bullshit, esp when we come to things like web drm

      • Name is Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has always been my understanding that uBlock and uBlock Origin were two totally different extensions for ad blocking. Is this not correct? Back several year ago when ad blockers were new, I recall seeing two different Firefox listings for them, and people would caution users to get uBlock Origin and not the other truncated named one

      • igorlogius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What can Firefox and uBlock do to stop Google from blocking adblock users on the site

        Not sure if you question is serious … but just in case, Mozilla is one of the few non-profit orgs that is fighting for an open web

        ref. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/

        and uBlock Origin can literally work its magic because firefox provides the necessary APIs that allows it to work. (old ref. but AFAIK still relevant: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox)

      • klyde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just another Firefox fan boy. They do this shit when as blockers get brought up too as if Brave, Vivaldi, etc isn’t going to strip out the ad blocker nonsense when they build their versions. Just because these versions use Chromium as a base in no way means they have to use their code. Firefox fan boys are too busy talking about Firefox to understand this.

  • AcidOctopus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two days ago I noticed when watching through the app on my phone that I could no longer just skip ads, and the trick of reporting them to skip didn’t work anymore either. I effectively had to just sit and wait.

    That same day I got NewPipe, imported my subscriptions, and honestly even if this is just a phased trial or something, I won’t be going back to the standard YT app.

    Creators make pennies from ad revenue. If I want to support them, I’ll make a donation or subscribe to their Patreon or something.

    I won’t just sit and suffer a slew of ads while my data is harvested under the false pretense that it’s all to support the creators.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, alphabet can rip off the creators but we can’t? What a crappy double standard.

    • ThePac@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of all the streaming platforms, YouTube treats its creators the best.

  • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Desktop replacements: FreeTube and Piped. I personally prefer FreeTube; the UI is way better than Piped.

    Android: LibreTube (it also works with Piped but I just imported my youtube subscription list instead). There is also NewPipe too!

    If you’d rather dump YouTube entirely, there is Odysee and PeerTube. Though for most people they’re just not viable, total replacements. Only you can decide for yourself on that matter.

    Enjoy!

    Edit: If you want to export your YouTube subs and playlists you’ll have to do Google Takeout; but after that it’s super easy to import/export them from Freetube and Piped whenever ya want.

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You might like NewPipe for android. Same flexibility with importing subs, but cleaner and less errors, in my experience, but as long as you’re not using the YT app…

    • TheChancePants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vinegar is a Safari extension for iOS that turns the YouTube media player into a generic iOS one, completely bypassing all of these restrictions. I’m not savvy enough to know if it’s something Google can kill or not, but it’s working great for me right now. Even lets you do PiP and background play.

    • Fangslash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For IOS peeps: I’m using Orion browser, which supports some firefox entensions like UblockOrigin that blocks ads. Brave also works.

      Downside is they’re missing a good number of features, and changing playback speed messes up the audio

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aw that’s so cute, they think they’ll be able to stop adblockers from working for more than a few days. Just like everyone else before them. Good luck with that guys.

  • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just yesterday they stopped allowing me to see home page and recommendations unless I turn on watch history, which I am not doing ever. So they can keep forcing my hand and see how far it goes. If anything am stubborn enough to enjoy this kind of petty behavior from major players. They keep thinking “oh they will just do what we ask them to”, but I’ll do the opposite out of spite. I’ll just use !videos or similar communities to find my recommendations until the day comes where I stop using it completely. I quit Facebook this way, quit Reddit and Twitter, quit WhatsApp. Keep at it guys, let’s see who’s more stubborn.

    • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll take some of that action. There needs to be some sort of medical term for the reaction that adverts inspire in me. At this point, it’s pathological. It’s interesting to contrast YouTube’s original form with the abomination it has become today. Almost as if corporations wait patiently while they achieve market dominance before they come out with absurd and Orwellian ethical statements about ‘breaking rules’. Before that it was a big house, come on in and enjoy the cornucopia. No, Google, we will never stop blocking your poison. All we want is the service.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think they care about the small handful of people who will stop watching YouTube over this, to be honest.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is fine by me! But I doubt the number will be so small. Still I don’t care how many. Am not selling my data becauseo others are. -

  • Cora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have YouTube ReVanced on my phone. If YouTube ever defeats uBlock Origin on my desktop, I just won’t watch YouTube on desktop anymore. I refuse to watch or view ads.

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does it work normally for You? Mine broke last week and freezes every video at around 70 seconds.

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m unironically considering ditching any online interaction(s) on the internet and use my PC solely for offline content (write documentaries, texts, play retro games). Because I really don’t want to use the internet with that level of intrusion in my pc.

    • Packopus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Take any cybersecurity class and you’ll want to burn your tech in a dumpster. In most cases it’s security by obscurity from sheer numbers that hackers/sites don’t give a crap about you alone.

      Additionally, every site you have ever visited tracks your browser, IP, OS, location, and more. This AdBlock tracker is just observing that you have a plugin for ad blocking. That’s the least intrusion that YouTube does.

      In summary, there’s no need to be paranoid, but only because everything that can be stolen or observed already has been.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is like people freaking out over giving out their phone number and SS number. I guarantee you that info is already out there in countless databases.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sucks but on the flipside it means that I’ll have more time for myself.

    I already spend less time on social media because R/all sucks balls and lemmy doesn’t have too much content. I don’t have any other social media.

    I also don’t have cable or pay for streaming services, so I found a replacement in the form of YouTube and Spotify (podcasts). I’m ok if these options go away.

    There are a lot of hobbies that I want to do and the less distracted I am, the higher chance that I’ll choose to do them instead of dicking around.

    Tldr: brings it on!

    • 99nights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I used to be on reddit everyday before everything went to hell and now I’m only on it like once a week and lemmy only a few days in between usage.

      Life is more… enjoyable now? Lol

      • jwagner7813@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me, I wouldn’t say it’s more enjoyable per se. I miss looking into interesting topics. However, I do find myself focusing on my business more which I guess is a bonus. But outside of that, it’s very disappointing the enshitification of the Internet that’s occurring.

  • aicse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    They also started to fight piped and invidous, nevertheless it won’t make me buy their subscription, I’ll just ditch the platform.