• neatchee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unpopular opinion here but service providers should be allowed to enforce whatever conditions they want (within the law) for accessing and using their service.

    There are plenty of other video hosting services. If you don’t like what YouTube is doing, don’t use their service. Not sure why people feel entitled to free content AND the ability to keep them from earning revenue.

    The expectation of free content with no revenue stream attached is unsustainable. Pay for the content, or let them monetize it

    And this is coming from someone who runs pi-hole on their network for security reasons.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a problem when they have a sort of diagonal integration into the industry, as they’re kind of pulling up the ropes from competition while monetizing the product. It reeks of looming antitrust.

      If I want to distribute billions of videos to billions of people on my own site, that’d be great, but my options are basically to pay Google, Amazon, or Microsoft for help.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m happy to talk about antitrust and breaking up conglomerates. But that needs to be a big conversation across many industries not just “Google bad, grrr”.

        If you’re referencing WEI, btw, it is one of the topics people have been most misled about. Can link you to my Mastodon thread where I break down all the misunderstanding if you’d like

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because their revenue stream comes entirely from destroying our privacy throughout the entire internet?