Twitter is threatening legal action against the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a nonprofit that researches hate speech and content moderation on social media platforms.

The letter from Twitter’s lawyers alleges that CCDH’s research publications are intended to ‘harm Twitter’s business by driving advertisers away from the platform with incendiary claims.’

This is a pretty bold move from Twitter, especially considering that CCDH is a well-respected organization that has been doing this kind of research for years. And it’s especially ironic coming from Elon Musk, who has said that he’s a ‘free speech absolutist.’

But Musk has also shown that he’s sensitive to criticism, so it’s not surprising that he’s taking this kind of action against CCDH

    • Dima@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love that this is a legal letter and yet contains the very direct phrase:

      That threat is bogus and you know it.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love it. The gist is:

      • hate speech is running rampant on your platform.
      • you’re doing nothing to stop it.
      • here’s our evidence.
      • where’s your e idence?
      • why are you spending time and money on fighting us instead of on fighting the literal white supremacist death threats on your platform?
      • telling us we’ve not sampled enough tweets while you’re in the process of making impossible the mass sampling of tweets is…a bit rich.
      • we’re not intimidated by your threats
      • your threats are also bullshit
      • we’re not gonna stop

      It’s a textbook example of “no u” in grown up language. Bravo.

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Legal snark is by far the most expensive brand of humor, but when it’s deployed on your behalf it’s so goddamn satisfying.

        During a hearing in my divorce, I answered a question from the judge, the other lawyer says “we can’t have hearsay in this discussion”, my lawyer responds “well this will be a short hearing then because everything in your client’s motion is hearsay”.

        That little snap cost me about $15 but it was worth it.