Phillips shotgun ammo

It’ll be here sooner than you think, friend

Man I’ve had enough bad news for one week :(

Same. Guess I won’t bother looking into it if it’s impossible 🤷‍♀️

Useless “nobody”.

My story but with anime. Japan has some really annoying laws requiring their shows to be blurred and dimmed during fast-paced scenes and it absolutely butchers the height of good animations.

The Blu-ray releases don’t have this issue, but guess what releases aren’t available for purchase/streaming for English audiences. 🫠 I want to give them money so bad, but 🤷‍♀️

I get the sentiment but I don’t think anything here addresses anything I haven’t already mentioned. The labor is certainly being used and it’s certainly for profit, but not in any way that humans don’t already do.

I really am sympathetic towards artists, though. Like I get that a lot of demand for their work could one day be taken by what generative AI is working towards. I just don’t understand how we can reasonably call it theft/crime when a computer figures out how to make an image by looking at other images but not when humans do it. The whole thing seems like an appeal to emotion.

Honestly I still don’t understand the “stealing” argument. Does the stealing occur during training? From everything I’ve learned about the technology, the training, in terms of the data given and the end result, isn’t any different than me scrolling through Google images to get a concept of how to draw something. It’s not like they have a copy of the whole Internet on their servers to make it work.

Does it occur during the image generation? Because try as I might, I’ve never been able to get it to output copyrighted material. I know over fitting used to be an issue, but we figured out how to solve that issue a long time ago. “But the signatures!!” yeah, it’s never outputted a recognizable/legible signature, it just associates signatures with art.

Shouldn’t art theft be judged like any other copyright matter? It doesn’t matter how it was created, it matters if it violates fair use. I really don’t think training crosses that line, and I’ve yet to see these models output a copy of another image outside of image-to-image models.

You when billion dollar companies want to literally shove more ads in your face:

It’s when you suck oligarch cock

🥾👅

We can dream 😔

Honestly, they could probably solve the majority of it by blacklisting Reddit from fulfilling the queries.

But I heard they paid for that data so I guess we’re stuck with it for the foreseeable future.

Spicy going in, spicy coming out

Depending on how you look at it, that is what he said

In German, “gross” = “great”

The point was that I absorbed that information to inform my “art”, since we’re equating training with stealing.

I guess this would have been a better example lol. It’s clearly not Gandalf, but I wouldn’t have ever come up with it if I hadn’t seen that scene

It’s so weird to me that this scene never actually happened in RvB. The first few times I saw this format I could visualize it, I could hear it, but now when I search for it all I get is people who also thought it actually happened.

It’s just such a RvB joke, and I swear to god there was a scene where they asked about O’Malley’s gender, but I can’t find this exchange specifically

Edit: scratch that, it was actually Donut

Look guys! I’m stealing from Tolkien!

Wouldn’t one downvote plus one upvote be 1 again

I smell a short position in my future after that IPO…