Same, what the hell
Hugucinogens
- 11 Posts
- 10 Comments
Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Gay: News, Memes and Discussion@lemmy.world•She knows!English14·10 days agoDon’t underestimate Granny, she is proud of you for living life ❤️
Fuck yes, it (Killing Eve if I’m not mistaken) was great.
The les bién
Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Welcome to our instance GenP!English3·2 months agoI think I read somewhere genp got banned in reddit recently, so it might just be an attempt to migrate some of the community
But let’s get an answer regardless
Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto sapphic art@lemmy.blahaj.zone•She discovered something about herself1·1 year agoI’m having mixed feelings, about “gay panic” being reclaimed as “cute panic attack”.
On one hand, it’s cute, memably useful, and makes me feel fuzzy inside.
On the other hand, it (and “trans panic”) are the names of legally enshrined excuses to literally murder or otherwise assault lgbt folks, and get off with significantly reduced sentences (on the scale of half what would otherwise be) from the courts. Because once, in the distant past of —(literally today’s 10 American states still??? Wtf???), “being sexually approached and panicking, flying into mad rage from disgust, and assaulting/killing them”, was called gay panic, gave reduced sentences, and was seen as reasonable defense.
Maybe, making history(and apparently present politics) harder to remember and research, should be avoided. I’m not sure what’s right, people will decide that by using the language. But I think personally I’ll try to avoid this, admittedly cute use of the phrase.
So, I don’t trust them to have actually done what I’m going to describe, (and honestly I’ve just accepted that even with everything off, they’re still giving me ads based on stuff I’ve only talked about and never clicked or written anything), but:
The programs that recognize specific phrases(Ok Google), are always separate from normal voice recognition (and much much lighter in terms of processing). So, if they weren’t Google, they might have left the “Ok Google” recognition on, but not process anything else that the mic receives.
They’re probably still listening in though.
That’s literally not what they said, or implied. I hope you’re just bad at reading and social comprehension, someone else may take up explaining it to you.
Unless you’re a bot or a paid actor. (Or did the writer edit their comment to add “rich” after you posted? That might be implied by the couple of comments below.)