• 46 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年4月27日

help-circle







  • A newly elected government that is for neutrality and against joining NATO, while not being a pawn of the Western regimes, would greatly help the Ukrainian workers.

    How is being a pawn of Putin any better than being a pawn of the west? We’re talking about the lives and income of “workers” here. Seems to me the average worker in Ukraine would have way more opportunity if Ukraine is aligned with the west than with Putin.

    Diplomacy and negotiations would be required, as well as not wanting to join NATO and staying neutral.

    You say that like it’s never been tried before. Tell me, what should Ukraine give up in order to obtain peace? Because Russia’s terms for peace are essentially “Surrender.”

    Also why exactly would Ukraine not want to join NATO, especially since they’ve been invaded? Seems to me this is like telling someone you’ve threatened to kill that they’re not allowed to call the police. Who in their right mind would agree to that?

    The CIA and US military had been in Ukraine before 2014, as well as other Western agencies and military.

    Please tell me how they are making money. The question was “Which intelligence agencies and politicians are making money from the war?” Please tell me how, exactly, the CIA is “making money” and which politician is “making money,” i.e war profiteering, because that is your actual claim.

    The military-industrial complex, they supply the weapons and bombs, and the land is flattened.

    So your contention then is that corporations in “the west” are artificially extending the war by supplying Ukraine, specifically so they can profit from it, is that correct? Just want to be sure I’m not misunderstanding.

    If that is right, then what, exactly, is your solution for Ukraine, which is not surrendering? Please assume for this discussion that surrender is not an option.


















  • Hawanja@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlJerkoff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 个月前

    Except in real life you actually said this stupid shit:

    Like it’s so fucking hard to imagine that “Super Humans” which exactly translates to German as “Ubermench” could have nazi ideology baked in to the very foundation.

    This is the dumbest fucking thing I’ve ever read in my entire life and shows you know absolutely nothing about the subject. The concept of a “superhero” predates National Socialism, concept of a Nazi superman, and even the creation of fascism as an ideology itself, and in fact has roots in myths and folklore.

    But you wouldn’t know that because you’re too busy being sniffing your own farts. Here’s some advice, try reading a comic book before you talk about them, maybe then you won’t look so stupid.



  • Hawanja@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlJerkoff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 个月前

    So fucking sick of people who do exactly zero reading on a topic spouting off with ‘common sense’ and think their incredulity is the same thing as having a single thought knocking around your head.

    So fucking sick of people reading a book and suddenly thinking they’re right about everything. Have you considered the book you’re reading may be incorrect, or that there’s more involved with superheros than “Buff white guy = Nazi,” especially with a character that was created specifically to oppose fascism?

    So just the fact that a character is super strong automatically makes him a Nazi?

    Booster Gold is a buff white superhero. Is he a Nazi? Such bullshit.