How is taking the right to fight it in state court away pro state rights?

So you’re just going to completely misread an article and make an ass of yourself and not even own up to it?

I think state rights should mean that a state has the ability the challenge the laws that govern it. This bill specifically has wording to prevent that, it’s the entire reason this article was posted. Please explain to me how stripping a states population of its rights to challenge a bill that governs them is suppose to be for their rights?

It’s only state rights in the senses that it’s eroding them.

You also have to look at the statistics for rate of smoking in austistic vs non austistic people because people with autism are more likely have children with autism.

You can still afford pitchforks?

They probably just used chatgpt…