“He died” expresses an action, while “he’s dead” expresses a state

Two consenting adults on a date? Definitely creepy!

deleted by creator

Lmao, dude honestly just suggested Wikipedia as a reliable source of information. Fucking hell

Any of those boring-ass superhero movies. What is so appealing about hour-long GCI fight scenes and no plot?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquest_of_the_Levant

Also Tiffany, Dennis, Squirrel, and Jerome

That’s precisely the point. If the Palestinians have the right to the land because they were the most recent conquerors, then what happens when the next conquerer comes, claiming the same right of conquest?

My penis is very hard difficult

The whole claim to having a “right” to exist on conquered land is kind of a weird one, philosophically.

If it’s legitimate to acquire territory through conquest, then there’s no debate that the land belongs to the Palestinians. But, consequently, if conquest is a legitimate means of acquiring territory, then the Israelis are not doing anything different in acquiring the land than the Muslims did when they first conquered Palestine and established their colony there.

On the other hand, maybe conquest is not a legitimate means of acquiring territory and the Israelis are in the wrong for trying to gain land that way. But if that’s true, that conquest is not a legitimate means of acquiring territory, then the Muslim conquerors who took Palestine in the first place were also in the wrong and their claim to the territory is similarly illegitimate.

Depends where you live, but it definitely is

I thought I had a hobby, but apparently I’m autistic. Thanks, internet!

How is it possible to be that shit at spelling? Jesus

Towelie always says: “Don’t forget to bring a towel!”

If you have an enemy that’s trying to eradicate you, your choices are either to allow them to eradicate you, or to eradicate them first. Any middle ground will just bring you back to the same position you started in.

CUT IT IS HEAD OFF

This, but for Wikipedia.

Edit: Ironically, the down votes are really driving home the point in the OP. When you aren’t an expert in a subject, you’re incapable of recognizing the flaws in someone’s discussion, whether it’s an LLM or Wikipedia. Just like the GPT bros defending the LLM’s inaccuracies because they lack the knowledge to recognize them, we’ve got Wiki bros defending Wikipedia’s inaccuracies because they lack the knowledge to recognize them. At the end of the day, neither one is a reliable source for information.