No, he clearly wanted a Nintendo Switch.

Agreed. The chicken’s closest natural ancestor, the red jungle fowl, would continue to live in the wild. Unlike modern chickens, they only lay around once a month (as opposed to upwards of once a day), and they aren’t bred to be excessively large to the point that many can’t even walk properly. It would definitely be more humane to let these human made species go extinct.

By your definition, are you morally evil, trying to become neutral?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/peta-taking-pets/

PETA does not kill animals because they’re against pet ownership. PETA administers euthanasia services for shelters that are over capacity.

In the wild.

I think it’s morally neutral to ask why we kill animals. Do you kill the animals you eat?

Is that the metric then? If you don’t know you’re going to be killed, it’s ok to kill you?

The moral middle ground is to not kill animals (or pay someone to) if you don’t need to.

Whether I get their next console depends entirely on them keeping the NSO games and backwards compatibility with switch games.