I don’t, it’s not the 18th century and the industrial revolution. Copyright had a time and place and that isn’t the here and now. We are worse off for copyright and patients today. Today they enshrine wealth and are a tool to prevent progress and inflate cost.
The world is a much worse place with bad search. We need a search system that is treated like a utility and paid based on success not ad views.
You’re missing the forest for the trees. There are plenty of ways to encourage actions without coupling them to taxes. Make the tax code simple, and put the complexity in the systems that deal with people.
For the very rich, its extremely hard to know what they own, filing taxes allows them to hide all the details.
So if a tool is involved, it’s no longer ok? So, people with glasses cannot consume copyrighted material?
Well since 1952, but yes.
The issue is the ownership of the AI; if it were not ownable or instead owned by everyone, there wouldn’t be an issue.
It will be even worse if you must pay for all data to train an AI because it will make the systems even more exclusive. Copyright as a law is incompatible with AI and the change must be to require models trained on controlled works to be provided free.
We did away with that pesky business failures. Now all corporate are eternal.
So Christmas gifts are a market?
Do you really think all exchange of goods is a market?
The ole can have criticism without perfect solutions response. Cool, how useless and pointless of you.
I, a socialist, hate markets. They are simplistic and functional artifacts of the available way to pass information.
I have extreme dietary restrictions that make a vegan diet hard, i try, but sometimes I eat meat. This sucks.
You clearly didn’t read the article.
Its got to be a relatively small group who knows enough to understand loops and is also afraid of math symbols.
Authentication of the author is not the same as copyright.