Here’s the most recent example:

• Firefox’s new data collection feature sparks user backlash: here’s how to disable it

The browser that promises “no shady privacy notices or advertiser backdoors” on its storefront has suddenly added an experimental feature to beam user interactions to advertisers and enables it by default. Many are not happy.

I’m not the one who told corrected you earlier, but ket me reiterate…

You are incorrect in your assumption that our “country,” government, etc. censors our speech. Some people choose to self-censor and the government has nothing to do with that.

Also, you seem confused about what free speech (see: first amendment) actually means. This XKCD might help explain it to you.

You mean you actually read the article? Blasphemy!

33%, but yeah. Both are true.

66% of eligible are voting, 33% of eligible are not voting. Of the 66% that did vote, half of those (I used 49%) voted for Trump. Half of the 66% is 33%.

So, of the eligible voters, 33% voted Biden, 33% voted Trump, and 33% didn’t vote.

Or, if you want math:

.66 * .49 = .32 or 32%

Edit: I misunderstood the question and gave an off-topic answer. Someone else commented the correct reason: not all Americans are eligible to vote. Children, felons in certain States, etc. Since they didn’t/can’t vote they’re not counted in the “half of America” statistic often quoted.

Half of eligible voters voted for trump, which is about 32% of America in 2020.

49% of the americans

More accurately, 49% of voters. Out of all of the eligible voters in the 2020 election only 66% actually voted. And, that election had the highest turnout in over a century.

So when trying to calculate how many eligible voters voted for Trump in 2020 you’ll have to take the statistics above into consideration.

49% of 66% is 32% if my math is correct. 32% of eligible voters voted for Trump.

Sorry for being pedantic but it annoys me when people say that half of America supports Trump when it’s just not true.

Do you mean Rizon? What about it?

Linkerbaan is just a troll. Always trying to muddy the conversation with terms like “genocide joe” and “sleepy joe.” I assume “genocrats” are his clever portmanteau for genocide Democrats.

Edit: notice how he edits his comments to make them more “both sides” instead of the original “Democrats bad” message.

And, IIRC, it’s just a trial to see if it will work.

Edit: I should have read the article linked in a comment above…

“As spotted by The Document Foundation, the government has apparently finished its pilot run of LibreOffice and is now announcing plans to expand to more open source offerings.”

“In 2021, the state government announced plans to move 25,000 computers to LibreOffice by 2026. At the time, Schleswig-Holstein said it had already been testing LibreOffice for two years.”

So, it seems the trial may be over and they are migrating for good.

I have now added “throat-game” to my vocabulary.

Would you provide a reputable source please?

“Where do you think that house is going when they die?”

That depends. Do they have a reverse mortgage?