Too much for me, I’m out 🏳️

I think they should sell it to me.

As an unrelated point, when I searched again just now, most of the entries in the search engine were from Lemmy/Mbin, followed by Mastodon. Mostly this post and others like it

So you got this survey in an email. Was the link intended to be shared like this? Can I find the survey link somewhere on Mozilla’s own websites?

The email was through their newsletter and I would have offered to forward it, if it didn’t have personal information in it. Maybe someone else who is subscribed to the newsletter can back up the claim instead?

I actually searched for the website link to put in the post body before sharing, and went through a similar thought process as yours when I didn’t find it. My reasons for sharing it anyway were:

• Sometimes these emails say to not share it further, but this one didn’t
• I see it shared already in a few places unofficially (Mastodon, Reddit, Twitter)
• It mentioned ‘Mozilla Community’ and not a more specific group, so this audience seemed appropriate
• People here might have better feedback than I could write up, so it should be a net positive for Mozilla

It would be nice if they did post about it on an official account to resolve any concerns. If it helps, it looks like “mozillafoundation.tfaforms.net” has been used for other surveys in the past and so you might find a link to that domain from an official source

edit:

their website has links to that domain based on a search of the GitHub repo

For example, the ‘Submit a product here’ link on this page: https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/

It’s also possible to submit without filling in the demographic questions if people are concerned but still want to submit

I see a textbox saying “What do you want to see from Mozilla in the future?” You could add it there, as justification for why you want them to focus less on it

There is a text box part way through, I included my more general thoughts there

(my comment was getting rambly)

Specific to generative AI, I think client side generation can be a good thing, such as sentiment analysis or better word suggestions/autocomplete.

A number of other helpful tasks have negative outcomes, but if someone is going to use it, then I prefer they use the version of the tech that minimizes those negative outcomes. Whether Mozilla should be focussing on building that is a different matter though

AI that isn’t generative AI has a lot of positive uses, but usually that’s not what these discussions are about

Very cool, and thank you for taking the time to make such a detailed post!

If you are using any Synology products with your setup, you should go ahead and apply the recommended updates

I’d imagine it’s the same as personal finance apps. A spreadsheet can be enough, and it is enough for a lot of people, but a custom app can make things easier:

• reducing the friction of keeping track
• built in visualizations
• alerts
• integrating the data with other tools

etc.

Something being FOSS doesn’t necessarily mean it’s safe / ethical, but a LOT of FOSS apps are designed with those principles in mind.

However, being FOSS means that if an app claims that it is safe / ethical (ex. In this case, not storing data anywhere but on your device), you or an experienced peer can check the code to verify that fact.

Good note, I didn’t notice that in the original post. I edited the title

I wonder if there is any pattern to those numbers

edit: ah I didn’t notice, thanks all :)

There was the attack on the Internet archive recently, are there any good options out there to help mirror some of the data or otherwise provide redundancy?

One option that I’ve heard of in the past

https://archivebox.io/

ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view websites offline.

There is nothing inherent in knockoff that says it doesn’t work. That would be a fake.

While I can find definitions that call it “an inferior copy” (link), that’s not the point. Common usage has made it so that people will assume things about the quality or efficacy of the medication when certain words are used. Even if a word is technically correct, perceptions about the word can make it a bad choice.

Often when patents expire and other options emerge, they are called “generics” or “store brand” versions. Those terms don’t carry the negative associations.

The original comment you replied to said

Yeah, they aren’t “knock-offs” or “imitations.” That is some bad reporting.

They used quotes to point out that those words usually imply an inferior quality, something which doesn’t do what it says that it does, something that is produced without permission, etc.

While the drugs may still be copies, word choice can affect how people perceive the quality / efficacy of them.

Example from another Lemmy thread I just saw

France’s browser-based website blocking proposal will set a disastrous precedent for the open internet (blog.mozilla.org)

Work like this, calling out harmful laws or tech company power grabs, is political. It’s also very important, and in line with what Mozilla’s mission is.

The “politics” isn’t separate from the products though. The fact is that their competitors, Google/Amazon/Facebook etc, all have significant political arms as well. They fund initiatives, lobby governments, and try to squeeze out more power and influence in the tech landscape.

You can’t fight all that with a “better product” only. Especially if most casual users don’t care about those “better” features (usually privacy and security related ones) as much as we might. Market share won’t shift with a couple more extra features in Firefox.

If their political arm is pushing for better privacy laws and fighting against corporate control of the tech world, then that is in line with what I’d want my donation money going towards. You can’t get a free and open web with a better browser alone, you need to advocate for better laws and fight against companies that want the exact opposite.

I do agree that their finances could use some more openness and explanation. I’m leaning towards this being incompetence (or lack of focus) rather than malice.

the original mastodon post

Unrelated to this post:

IMO it’s stuff like this, original content that shows up on Mastodon/Lemmy/Kbin first, that will get people to switch over.

Slow organic growth is nice. Keep making good quality content and people will shift over