We only get 200 GiB for that price in the USA - I was surprised they offer so much more over there

Wait - you can get 1tb for £2 there?

I wouldn’t mind as much if it was that price.

It stems from companies being too cheap to get people work phones, but still wanting them to be available

We were taught about OpenMP in like 2012 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMP

Intel’s TBB was also used some, but not as frequently https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threading_Building_Blocks

I enjoy that they literally did. The article says the OTA update is just to ignore a hardware sensor

Which begs the question, why was that sensor needed originally?

pack our plans with value and build out the industry’s best 5G network

I’ve generally needed to disable 5G on their network because it was slower than LTE. 5G has only been useful in places they didn’t have coverage before in my experience

I must have had an extension at the time, but it sounds like F-Droid does automatic updates for anything Android 12+ now?

https://f-droid.org/de/2024/02/01/twif.html

I guess the nag screen can be scary, though. Good point

Any idea how this demand is different from the current state of Android?

Under Epic’s terms, any app downloaded from anywhere would operate identically to apps downloaded from Google Play, without Google imposing any unnecessary distribution fees.

Last time I used it, I downloaded all my apps through F-Droid, and I didn’t think they were paying Google anything?

And they’re allowed to start doing it again in 5 years

block third-party cookies within Incognito mode for five years

Maybe, but Android keeps rewriting its Bluetooth stack from scratch

Android’s current Bluetooth stack has only been around for like 2.5 years

So it’s also less battle tested, probably, although less likely to have memory corruption bugs

HRBlock is the same.

I refused to use them ever again after they tried to charge me $300 when it was listed as “free”

What are the compelling features compared to e.g. newsboat?

Knowing an exec who has a nanny, they’re paying them around $7,000 a year and trying to make them feel like they never do enough

Their nanny works around 75 hours a week

It’s businessinsider. The answer is always “no”

They found a post on an anonymous forum complaining and made an article about it because it fits their narrative that workers are being paid too much

They even misspelled “job” in the middle of the article they spent so little time proofreading or fact checking

Edit: The only interesting lines in the article

could get $170,000 in pay and benefits in five years’ time

The agreement has yet to be officially approved