He/Him Jack of all trades, master of none

  • 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 10th, 2023

help-circle



  • starman2112@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlHard to swallow pills
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Close, but that metaphor was not equating either country with a serial killer, I was merely pointing out that one party’s use of bombs does not necessarily make them worse than another party who does not use bombs. Sorry you’re bad at reading

    And also, it’s not the infrastructure or clean energy that gets people to not like china, it’s all the censorship and oppression


  • I haven’t actually met or talked to a lot of Chinese people, on account of not speaking the language, and the Great Firewall. I wonder why that’s there

    You’ve acknowledged that I’m allowed to say things that don’t actually threaten the US government. Does comparing Xi Jinping to Winnie the Pooh actually threaten the Chinese government?


  • starman2112@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlHard to swallow pills
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Lmao “free speech that doesn’t threaten the government is tolerated everywhere”

    This statement would still be true if you were talking about Oceania. It’s totally meaningless. Who decides what speech threatens the government? The government. I can say fuck Joe Biden, fuck Donald Trump, and fuck every member of Congress and the Supreme Court. Can you point me towards someone living in China who’s comfortable openly saying “fuck Xi Jinping?”



  • https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/technology/google-surveillance-toddler-photo.html

    Here’s the article. Imagine losing access to everything that your physical driver’s license can’t help you get back. I would be in jail for one reason or another if google fucked my life over that bad

    As for Mark, Ms. Lilley, at Google, said that reviewers had not detected a rash or redness in the photos he took and that the subsequent review of his account turned up a video from six months earlier that Google also considered problematic, of a young child lying in bed with an unclothed woman.

    Mark did not remember this video and no longer had access to it, but he said it sounded like a private moment he would have been inspired to capture, not realizing it would ever be viewed or judged by anyone else.

    They could have just made this up wholesale. What is Mark gonna do about it? He literally doesn’t have access to the video they claim incriminates him, and the police department has already cleared him of any wrongdoing. Google is just being malicious at this point.