No one dared speak up against it, cause that isn’t a “growth mindset”.

Scaling capacity up and down in real time should be Microsoft’s core business now.

Why hand out bug fixes for free when you can charge full price once more instead?

From the point of view of a customer, the exact failure method is irrelevant.
Microsoft took a lot of money and wasn’t able to deliver what was promised in exchange.

When your game is a streaming service, you better put some cloud experts on the dev team.

The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that’s left.

Lots. They were called flip phones.

In the US, they were called Quarterpounder Technologies.

“bloat” is just short for “your computer sucks”.
Dump your peasant tier shit and go fill up that 42U rack.

It’s good for speech to text, translation and a starting point for a “tip-of-my-tongue” search where the search term is what you’re actually missing.

deleted by creator

JavaScript makes browsers like Links borderline unusable

Not my experience. Links just makes borderline unusable websites completely unusable.

The browser you’re looking for is literally called Links.

Outside of work, A was part of a Labor Union, a Marxist gathering and an Anarchist bookclub.
So he was let go.

I and N were allowed to stay cause they were the ones who ratted on A.

They completely focus on large enterprises now.
Everyone who uses Fusion or Workstation productively is too small for them.

Disconnect the PC from the internet.
It’s also the only way to safely run a computer without updates.

Only if people are willing to pay for them.
There’s no reason a mobile game would be cheaper to develop than a PC game.
And there’s also no one paying $50 for a mobile game.
The market has decided.

They’re trash because they’re free.
Traditional games need to be good, so people buy them.
You don’t need to buy mobile games. But developers need to eat. So the money needs to be extracted from the people while they play.
So you need to implement microtransactions and design the entire game around making them necessary for success.
But most people stop playing a game at some point when they’ve beaten it, or are getting bored ot it.
So you need to make your game addictive instead.

The same principle applies to so many things (for example news).
If you don’t pay for it up front, the entire thing will be designed around extracting money from you during use.
Which means it needs to be designed to draw you in and keep you addicted. Delivering quality content is literally worthless.

If he had stolen $200M in workers’ wages instead, he’d be lauded as a successful entrepreneur.

To be fair, Skyrim still holds up today.