Note that you don’t know what the hosters know, store and/or sell about you.

I’m glad that you see my point that “other people hosting your data” is not really a good idea.

They host software for anyone to use, and capture all the data, usage patterns, etc, for themselves, to use for their benefit, and to use against you.

So I guess that we can agree that data stored on other people’s computers will not be safe. I honestly wonder why you think other people’s computers are safer if you know their names.

And you want to sit here and tell me they’re the answer?

I would be very grateful if you would only judge what I have written and not what you think I might have meant.

Are you just an apologist for FAANG, etc?

There is no reason to attack me personally, my friend.

Who’s paying you to post this disinformation?

Just in case I’m fundamentally misunderstanding your personal attack so I don’t report it to the moderators without cause: What is ‘disinformation’ about my pointing out that Google and Facebook host software for other people (even if they have their own motives)?

every community has somebody in it who does the self-hosting for the community

That’s what (e.g.) Google and Facebook do: Host software for the community.

You can’t extend, modify, or customize hosted software. Self hosting FOSS applications addresses all of those.

But:

rather than expect everyone to self-host, we should be working towards communities offering services to one another

How exactly are “communities offering services” a different thing than “hosted software”?

Bluesky bad

Crypto Goatse.

Get Disney and Sony first!

Time for a revolution.

+1 for NewsBlur. Its filtering is just plain awesome.

Classy comment.

But at least someone attempted to explain to you why you’re getting buried in downvotes.

I’m old enough and have been on the internet long enough not to judge the value of my statements by how many thumbs up they get. With regard to global politics, however, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to exchange arguments, and I find it regrettable that many people seem to think that pressing voting symbols is enough of an argument.

This whole discussion exists because the USA aren’t a free country either, or else the US-based Linux Foundation would not have to act like it does, I thought?

dipstick

The most normal Linux user showed up, I see.

This wasn’t a governmental decision this was a single person making a decision.

According to governmental regulations, yes. Please read up and try again.

Source?

No.

The fact that Russia does not remove maintainers for political reasons.

To my complete lack of surprise, Russia is seems to be a freer country for free software developers than the United States.

They were removed from the maintainer position of whatever they did. Bizarre enough.

Now if it supported org files too…