• 1 Post
  • 18 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle






  • In america doctors don’t take the Hippocratic oath anymore.. Doctors of medicine still take a modified version, but “Doctors of Osteopathy” take their own special oath where they have this wonderful little section which does a LOT of heavy lifting:

    …to employ only those recognized methods of treatment consistent with good judgment and with my skill and ability, keeping in mind always nature’s laws and the body’s inherent capacity for recovery.

    I will be ever vigilant in aiding in the general welfare of the community, sustaining its laws and institutions, not engaging in those practices which will in any way bring shame or discredit upon myself or my profession…

    And, as I’m sure you can imagine, this leaves open to the interpretation of the reader what constitutes “natural law”, “good judgment”, the “general welfare of the community”, or “practices which will bring shame or discredit”.

    Also, those Osteopaths, who are not even considered doctors in many international jurisdictions, still swear to hold to the principles of Osteopathy, a pseudoscientific quackery which says that anything your body needs to heal can be produced by your body. I’m sure you can guess how that relates to vaccines.





  • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.worksto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneBird Flrule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I recall a story, can’t remember where I read it, where a creator deity demonstrates their displeasure with the leader’s treatment of a downtrodden minority by sending a large number of “plagues”. I remember there was a plague of flies, all the livestock started dying of sudden disease, and an epidemic of boils broke out… Hmm… If only the US were filled with people who believed in the literal interpretation of certain old books…

    ETA: of course, that would require these people to be able to read.




  • Don’t know why you’re getting downvoted when the most believable name she could come up with for the token character of Chinese descent in the series was “Cho Chang”, whose only meaningful relation to the plot was as a shallow love interest until the main character got bored of her, and her idea of gay representation was “let’s make the character I just killed-off retroactively gay, and scandalize it by making him fall in love with wizard Hitler, and let’s do that just in time to show the audience that all of that character’s brightness and joy was an act covering for the fact that he was, canonically, by his own admission, raising the main character as a lamb to sacrifice on the altar of necessary evil”. Or that the money-grubbing bankers are squat little hook-nosed humanoids? Yeah… There’s no prejudice there at all.

    I loved the books as a kid, and I still love the first movie and a good bit of the world building, but come on, people.


  • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workstoScience Memes@mander.xyzLiquid Trees
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    ETA: Yes, that definitely needed clarification.

    Gray shit on your everything, concrete fucking everywhere, looming threat of 2-ton steel death machines caving in your head, overheating everywhere, asphalt plowing through everything, soaking up the sun at every step, tough lessons in momentum for kids crossing them, lot of traffic and pollution when there are drivers out.

    You could change half of your words, and keep the meaning the same, and make a compelling case that roads, or any other things, are humanity’s greatest scourge.

    If all you can do is complain that the natural world is insufficiently bent to your personal convenience, you are the problem with humanity right now.

    Go touch whatever remaining local flora people like you have allowed to continue to exist, and quit being an imbecilic bellend online.



  • Not relative to the sun, relative to momentum. Changes in the magnitude or direction of velocity are objective, not relative. These translate to real changes in momentum, from any reference frame. A real change in momentum is imparted upon the Earth roughly equal to your velocity relative to the earth multiplied by your mass at the moment your contact with the Earth ceases.

    ETA: I do actually agree with your salient point above: that lifting an object is relative to a given “down”, and so it is meaningless to expect to be able to “lift” the most massive object in the universe.