• AnotherOne@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, you love the creators you watch. Youtube, as a google company, created a businessmodel out of stealing data/private information and selling it to the highest bidder. I use newpipe, i never see ads but if i have a creator i want to support i send them money as direct as possible without middlemen (direct donations during livestreams for example). i pay the creator for their work. If google wouldn’t violate my human dignity by shoving a camera up my ass 24/7 i might consider giving them money to run their servers but as long as they try to make me a product they won’t see money nor data from me

    • electriccars@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a fair point, maybe I should look into using newpipe and use what was my monthly payment as a direct donation to my favorite creators instead. Thanks for the informative reply!

      • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they have a patreon, that would be the best way short of putting the money directly in their hands.

      • milkytoast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah I would say block ads, and then whatever u would normally spend on premium, donate to your favorite creators

        the creatora only get 55% (which isn’t bad all things considered) of the ad/premium revenue. by donating directly u spend the same but they get more

        • electriccars@startrek.websiteOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          52
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But to be fair, if YouTube themselves don’t make anything then the service that hosts my content creators isn’t sustainable. So just getting premium feels like the most moral option all things considered, at least for me.

          • milkytoast@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            yeah except idc, google can go fuck themselves. if yt dies, there are other platforms, such as peer tube. not as big, but if yt goes to shit, that where the creators will most likely go

    • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, you love the creators you watch.

      And Youtube makes that possible. Show me another service that is as good as Youtube is? Unlimited uploads for everyone, extremely fast constant delivery network. Require no logins or accounts to access the site. 4K video etc… etc… All for the low price of free with ads, or pay for no adds. They every are even one of the best at paying content creators. There is a reason almost every content creator ends up having some kind of account on Youtube.

      Youtube, as a google company, created a businessmodel out of stealing data/private information and selling it to the highest bidder.

      I don’t believe Google is in the business of selling data. There business is ad delivery. They keep the data to themselves as it is their secret sauce to deliver ads.

      • beefcat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Google absolutely is in the business of selling user data, through their ad network. AdSense customers use that data to target ads. It’s their whole business model. Just because they aren’t being given a database with all that data doesn’t mean they aren’t paying for access to it.

        Facebook operates the same way.

      • Litanys@lem.cochrun.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They keep the data to themselves as it is their secret sauce to deliver ads.

        I don’t think that’s entirely true. They won’t sell direct data, but through their ad and search systems your ads can drill down to very specific people and thus you know about them. It’s still crappy. It’s kinda unfair I think to outright say they don’t sell your data. You data is their core money maker. It’s just in a round about way. Sure maybe it doesn’t bother you, but in my opinion, the collection of data is the core problem with modern technology, not even just the internet. Data is extremely powerful and valuable.

        • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that’s entirely true. They won’t sell direct data, but through their ad and search systems your ads can drill down to very specific people and thus you know about them.

          Sure you can drill down to specific characteristics of people but as far as I am aware it is Google that actually handles the interactions/delivers the information. So I am not really sure what information a third party could gather about a specific person.

          But yeah I totally agree data collection is a huge problem basically every tech company is doing it. One of the reason why I try and self host as much as possible. To truly solve the problem we need better privacy laws in place.

  • Bizarroland@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If money could stop things from enshitifying, there would be very few shitty things on the planet.

    If everybody on the planet subscribed to YouTube premium they would still become enshittified.

    Even with 8 billion monthly subscriptions at $10 a month or more, Google would raise the prices and provide less service.

    They would do whatever they have to do whatever they can do to extract the most amount of money they possibly can out of the product.

    This is not just because Google is a shit company, this is because greed knows no bounds. The only way for a company to stop being enshitified is for the company from the top down to be radically opposed to enshittification.

    Only a good King can stop enshittification.

    There are no good Kings in Google.

    • electriccars@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know. Late stage capitalism is much more of a negative than a positive.

      But I did say slow enshitification. Slow =/= Stop.

      Enshitification:

      • OpenStars@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Whoosh moment… but I see what you did there - and I for one, like it!:-P

        Though tbf, I must be insane, b/c I legit just watch the ads. Okay so not watch watch them, or listen either tbh, but let them play out I mean… I watch fewer than one YT video per day, most often per week even, or sometimes per month, so that is just easier for me than anything else, and it feels good to know that I am supporting the content creators that way, which iirc YT does at least a halfway decent job of? (or I could be misremembering that, but I thought like not the best yet not the worst either, more solidly in the middle, median-wise if not average?) Like, it is literally the least I can offer:-D.

        Unless I want to listen to music, in which case I just turn on blocking of the ads - I guess I am not all that perfect (or bat-shit insane - ain’t nobody got time for dat!):-P.

        • electriccars@startrek.websiteOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just think I’m irritated with watching ads enough to pay to not need to. I also think I watch multiple YouTube videos nearly everyday, so I just consider it paying $0.05 to skip the ad automatically and still support the company and creators both.

        • maaj@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not a whoosh moment. I got it, I just didn’t feel like feeding into a masturbation joke is all.

  • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry, but I’ll pay for it when they stop spying on everything I do. And worse, is that they make it intentionally bad when you turn off suggestions.

    • electriccars@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      90% of my usage is on Mobile and through my Roku TV which both use specific apps to view YouTube. That’s my problem.

      I can use revanced to change the app on my phone, or download another app like NewPipe and that would work for a bit. But the hoops I’m referring to are when the apps get banned and need to be updated to work again, AND the hoops I feel I’d need to go to for an ad blocker at the router level so my Roku TV won’t show ads through YouTube. (Though I should probably look into that anyway to get rid of ads on my TVs home screen).

      It just feels like a hassle to me, and I’m paying $8/mo as a student anyway so it’s pretty cheap too.

      • Resistentialism@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On your tv. Go to settings, apps, see all apps, android tv home, then uninstall updates. Go to Google play store, your username icon, settings and disable auto-update apps. It’ll remove the crap at the top.

        To remove specific things from the home screen, scroll down to the one you want to remove. Then hit the little circled minus button.
        You can also install custom launchers if you really wanted to.

        If you care, you can also “uninstall” uninstallable apps with adb. And there’s a program called adb app control(I think that’s the name) that’ll let you easily remove them. They also have an called adb tv: app manager on the playstore. You need to enable adb debugging. But the app tells you what to do. Just don’t uninstall anything you don’t recognise. There’ll be a lot of things that are really important.

        As a signing off gift, smarttube is like revamced but for your tv. Find their github, download it, put it on your tv, either woth a USB or I use an app called send files to tv.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck google and the horse it rode in on. Never paying them a single red cent. They already make bank selling my data.

    Fuck em with a cactus.

  • Eavolution@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m still annoyed at the removal of google play music. I want to just buy tracks or albums, instead of a subscription, and just own a flac/mp3/music file I can do anything with.

    I rip cds now, and feel 0 guilt for that even though its illegal here because quite frankly the artists are getting more money this way.

  • FiralTheSpiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let me just share a few FOSS apps that are arguably better than their official google counterparts.

    For YouTube: Libretube, NewPipe

    For YouTube Music: InnerTune, ViMusic

    And, not open source, but if you want to support the creators (and artists) you like, buy merch. YouTube doesn’t get a cut of the merch sales to my knowledge.

  • DekkerNSFW@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Enshittification is not a thing that will be slowed if only we just pay Google more. It’s a well-honed business strategy. Nobody in their right mind would stop their plans just because people start paying them more, voluntarily.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    YouTube, removes downvote count, and implements shitty start up noise that I can’t disable, and raises price. Then wonders why I don’t want to pay for that shit.

  • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ve found quite the hornets nest, it seems.

    I pay for premium because YouTube does video delivery better than anyone else in the world, and it’s not free for them to provide. Lots of things to hate about YouTube/Alphabet, but theft is a corrupt way of expressing discontentment.

    Also, if I pay for premium, then content creators get paid, and I don’t have to shell out for merch to not feel like a terrible person.

      • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I imagine if it doesn’t make sense to you already, I won’t be able to help you understand, but here goes anyway.

        A company pays a lot of money to have a service developed and hosted, then offers a paid teir, and an ad supported teir. If you neither pay, nor watch ads, yet still use the service, then the company is incurring fees due to your usage while receiving no revenue for providing the service.

        Like, YouTube videos are great. Practically a utility at this point. However YouTube, the platform, is a company not a charity; if you cost them money, while providing $0 revenue, you’re stealing their money.

        Personally I don’t think theft is justified outside extreme desparation (stealing food, basically), and given that YouTube gives you an option that does not require giving them money I find it hard to justify stealing bandwidth.

        • superkret@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          YouTube voluntarily chooses to still provide their service to me when I block ads. They could easily block that. But they don’t. They don’t even ban my account when I log in with an ad blocker and they still let me upload videos and publish them. Is it theft if someone hands something to you without a threat of force and you take it?

          • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            If YouTube started banning Adblockers they’d end up with really bad PR and an arms race, neither of which would sound terribly appealing (although I predict this is a policy change in the works already).

            The problem with account bans is that, unlike steam accounts, YouTube accounts have no value associated with them. You ban one and another one pops up.

            If I went to the drive through, and they handed me a coffee and said “that’ll be $3. Would you like to pay with cash? or points?” And I just drove off, they wouldn’t chase me over it, but it is absolutely still theft.

            Listen, if you want to pirate content, go ahead, I can’t stop you, and it’s not like I haven’t done it myself, but don’t lie to yourself.

        • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You skipped the part where, upon purchasing YouTube, Google used their infinitely deep pockets to deliberately run all other video hosting services, and there were several, out of business and create a monopoly. I’m not going to question my morals over blocking ads from a company that itself is morally bankrupt.

        • SilentStorms@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The user should always be in control of the 1s and 0s entering their computer. Allowing some data and not allowing others is not theft. It’s not all-or-nothing for which data Google sends me and recieves from me, that’s absurd.

          • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This abstraction doesn’t make a ton of sense to me. Of course you’re in charge of your computer, but just because you’re free to choose a certain option, doesn’t make it moral, or legal. Using a companys service and making a special effort to withhold payment then saying “it’s not theft, they’re totally cool with it” is absurd. Why would they be cool with that?

            • SilentStorms@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t care of they’re cool with it, I’ll use my computer how I want to. Google makes hundreds of billions in annual revenue, it’s hard to feel bad for them. Calling that theft is a massive stretch, they are not losing anything except for potential profit, you could argue bandwidth but that is so intangible compared to any kind of physical theft.

              Keep in mind with adblocking we’re dealing with fractions of a penny per video and Google is still making money off me regardless. I directly support creators I like, sending them $10 is an order of magnitude more money than they would get over a lifetime of me watching ads.

              • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                you could argue bandwidth but that is so intangible compared to any kind of physical theft.

                Have you ever paid hosting fees? Digital != Intangible.

                Its up to you to decide what kinds of theft you’re ok with. I definitely pirate things, but I don’t lie about it and say it’s not theft. I just accept that sometimes I’m the bad guy.