IBM Software mandates in-office work for employees living within 50 miles | “Software Executive Focals” will be laying down the law::undefined

    • bfg9k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Financials coming up too. Got to make it look like they’re ‘taking action’ on poor performance.

      I hate how inhumane money makes us.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s odd too. A lot of places have offices in various cities too. So you can live in one city, and your team works in a different city or state. So their micromanaging isn’t possible since you’ll be at a completely different office. It just doesn’t make sense. So we enter the “quiet layoff” stages.

      Next headline will read, “Have companies started their own version of quiet quitting by forcing employees back to the office in an effort to get them to quit or he fired.”

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah my company’s office is 20 miles from where I live. I rarely go into the office, usually just for company events. Because the entire team I manage is based in India… so I would just be going into the office to have virtual meetings there instead of where I live. Thankfully they are on a fully remote policy, if they decided to change that I’d probably seek another job

        • Tandybaum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do exactly this 3 days a week…

          I would probably voluntarily go in 1-2 days a week because it’s nice to get out sometimes. However, a mandatory 3 days feels dumb.

  • silverbax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wow, yet another industry-trailing company showing why they are no longer relevant in big tech. They just sell overpriced garbage tech to other old, falling behind companies.

  • robbotlove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have to assume somebody’s done a cost analysis on rto and determined that keeping their boots on our necks is more profitable in the long run than employees being happier and more productive.

    • baru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have to assume somebody’s done a cost analysis

      I don’t get why you assume there’s a cost analysis that could be accurate over the reported productivity increases of working remotely.

      It’s likely the obvious, a change that isn’t good but it’s done anyway because people in a company often do not do what’s good for the company, they chase what’s good for them personally.

  • Tandybaum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My company has a mandatory 3 days in office policy already. However, they haven’t given any details about how it’s calculated.

    If I have a vacation Monday & Tuesday do those count toward my days or not? If not what if I’m out Monday - Wednesday? We have unlimited PTO so there is no formal record keeping of my days off. How does my boss (or whoever is counting my days) factor in considering my PTO? If I did 5 days one week does that mean I could do 1 day the next week? What about traveling for work?