That’s fair. Charging infrastructure isn’t ready if you can’t charge at home

Why is charging bad? Id argue it’s a plus. You never have to go to a gas station and every morning you wake up with a full charge for your day.

It’s good for existing share holders. IPOs can be bad for investors too. I wouldn’t want to touch this stock

Nintendo has $15B in cash and the company is worth $51B.

And no severance payout

If solid state batteries do work out line Toyota says, these old EVs aren’t going to be too attractive

Reddit has become yahoo answers for me. If an answer from Google pops up, read the top comment or two to get an answer and move on.

Exactly, around the world

This is also done by a company, envoy, that helps companies understand their office data. So it’s a bit of a conflict of interest.

The greenhouse recruiting study was more interesting. Attrition goes up and companies had a harder time filling the newly vacated roles compared to companies that didn’t force a back to the office.

Personally I think the back the office mandates are a way to do voluntary layoffs without making the execs look bad

The missing piece is salary is way down. With FAANG no longer paying $400K for engineers and hiring at an insane rate, the rest of the industry isn’t trying to play catch-up and compete on pay.

I used to work FP&A for a 2nd or 3rd tier tech company and it was hard competing to get engineers to join us. A kid out of college from a decent school for a $100k signing bonus from Facebook. I have since switched to a lower tier company but it has great work life balance, but we’ve lowered our salary on all open reqs because we know we don’t need to compete as aggressively and our average time to fill a role hasn’t changed.

My manager asked what I thought about our back to office announcement last month and I said it sounds like voluntary layoffs because if they cared about moral they would compensate us for going back. He laughed and said you’re probably right.

A company that just raised $10b from Microsoft is struggling with $260m a year? That’s almost 40 years of runway.