Ford lays off 600 workers at plant targeted by UAW strike::Ford is laying off workers while the UAW is striking against Ford, GM, and Stellantis. This is getting complicated.

  • TheMusicalFruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not defending Ford here. But we need to be supporting union workers by choosing union made products and services. Those that are saying they won’t buy a Ford now, that’s your choice, but I hope you’re doing your research and at least considering other automobiles that are union instead. Here is a 2023 list of all the UAW built vehicles: https://uaw.org/solidarity_magazine/2023-uaw-union-built-vehicle-guide/amp/

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I wanted a Chevy bolt because that’s the union made electric compact. I won’t buy a struck vehicle but I’ll never buy a non union new vehicle if I can help it. Purchasing non union products is the same as purchasing products from companies retaliating against a union, the only difference is the retaliators haven’t won yet.

    • hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it bad that I would rather buy a vehicle from the 90’s because it doesn’t have all this bs in it that 1. makes it harder to repair myself and 2. Just feels weird to drive (mainly talking the fly by wire style that modern cars are using, I want to feel the feedback on my gas pedal).

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, it’s definitely not bad to think that.

        (Source: I own four cars made in the '90s, for much the same reason.)

  • Weslee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they can prove the layoffs are retaliation, can’t the workers sure them? Or does that only apply to the initial action of unionisation?

      • evidences@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are actually protections for striking according to the NLRB “depending on the purposes and means of the strike action.”

      • Rebels_Droppin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe if it’s an unsanctioned wildcat strike they can fire without it being retaliation, but if it’s a strike backed by the NLRB they have to prove it isn’t retaliation and I don’t think the days gone by an official strike counts here. I could be wrong but that is what I remember about wildcat strike differences

      • Jonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends on the kind of strike. Workers that strike over a company’s unfair labor practice are protected from permanent replacements. This is not that tho. While they are far apart, I don’t think they can accuse the companies of refusing to negotiate.

        Of course if the union wins the strike then no replacement.

  • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck these fat cats! Take’em for all they’re worth UAW!