• De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s not only a search engine problem in itself - websites also got worse in general to appeal to googles algorithm. Which means that other search engines would show similar crap, unfortunately.

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah man, duckduckgo is good, there’s other alternatives and searx unified them all

      • Gabu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        DuckDuckGo is not good. It’s only marginally less pathetic than Google, but that has to do for the time being.

    • baropithecus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I legitimately switched back to local teletext as my main news source. No SEO bullshit, no ads, the articles are succinct and written by humans (for now).

  • firadin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like 90+% of the time I use Google, it’s just because it’s more convenient than going to the actual website I want. Like if I want a Wikipedia article about a movie, it turns out it’s faster to type in the movie name in Google and click than go to Wikipedia and search the movie.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Honestly people keep saying this but I just don’t find it to be true. Google is a vital daily resource for me, and usually the best way for me to find most things.

    Is this because I don’t use social networks? Are people somehow using Instagram or TikTok as search engines to find what they’re looking for? It feels like people just use social networks these days and nothing else, so maybe that’s it?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Let’s say I want to find an aftermarket built-in air jack kit for a car. Nevermind why, but let’s say it’s what I want to find.

      So I look up car air lift jack. Google spits back a grid of floor air bag jacks for sale, a stack of videos of floor air bag jacks by people trying to sell them, Another grid of floor air bag jacks for sale, then finally a couple of the kind that go on a car, and godammnit another grid of floor air bag jacks for sale, finally sponsored posts for floor jacks or the wrong kind, Amazon ads for the same thing, ads for brands of the floor jacks, and more, more, more, makers of the wrong thing, lowes, home depot, walmart…it’s all wrong.

      So the very next words out of your mouth are “Well, you used the wrong search term!” No, not really, but let’s try getting rid of “bag”, because that seems to be a big incorrect return on the search. So in goes “-bag” to the search term. What does that get us?

      The exact same fucking thing. “-” is meaningless anymore.

      So that’s google now.

      Want help with a tech problem?

      Wade through a stack of a dozen shitty youtube videos 10 minutes long each (because google pays more for ad space, longer videos have more space, so those get pushed to the top, and a problem that would take a paragraph of text to solve now becomes a shitty video with blather, subscribe, previous videos, like, other videos, and 2 minutes of actual help), a bunch of sponsored links to tech makers that have shit to do with your problem, and SEO sites like solveyourtechproblem.com or wefixitgood.com or whatever BS name for sites that consist of boilerplate help like “did you turn it off and on again?” Maybe after all that you’ll get an out of date reddit or github list of posts that don’t have anything to do with your exact issue. So you put it in quotes, that should work, right?

      “It looks like there aren’t many great matches for your search” says google.

      Why? I dunno. Not enough returns on the search to cram ads, sponsored links, shit for sale in?

      Google is shit. I’ve switched to DDG. It has it’s own frustrations, but at least I don’t have to put up with Google cramming every ad and sponsored link in front of me along with garbage SEO sites. Google’s heyday has ended.

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        The troubleshooting you list here second is my primary use for a Google search and it is completely garbage. Just like you say, it’s a bunch of trash SEO sites that don’t really address the problem so most of the time I add reddit to the search to get legit answers. Because reddit has a garbage search engine, of course.

        Though I have to admit I have given up on that and just use DDG to search for Reddit results. It used to be that I’d start on DDG and if it didn’t have what I need I’d go to Google, but Google search has gotten so bad that I almost never bother anymore.

    • AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’ve been doing a lot of searches lately about running, picking shoes, overpronation, training schedules, etc.

      Straight google searches (ones that would have returned worthwhile results even ten years ago) are all trying to sell me something, or are AI generated content filler garbage.

      I have to add “reddit” to every search in order to get real information from normal people.

  • maniel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    not sure about other languages, but with Polish Google is still the most useful one, Bing and DDG don’t even hold a candle to it, that said i still think Google went to shit hard

    • sgtlighttree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same, DDG fails with local results here in the Philippines, I found myself adding “g!” to my searches more often

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    I just get tired of jumping through hoops to find what I’m searching for… Instead of what Google wants me to see

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Of course it has, and this effect was completely foreseeable, and indeed, was foreseen, from the very moment they decided to whore themselves out with that IPO. They took their role as custodian of the baby internet and became a pimp.

    Stop calling it anything else. As a musician, I promise you, trying to promote yourself online feels like prostitution. If you’ve ever tried, then you know too. The only difference is if I were a prostitute I might actually make some money back.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Google’s search engine has gotten lazy, with the first dozen or more hits being YouTube and Reddit results.

    • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      What if these are primary places where user generated content lives now? Independent blogs are as good as dead, and social networks are walled gardens, sometimes populated by self regurgitating robots.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        What if these are primary places where user generated content lives now?

        Plenty of high quality user generated content live on Discord, Slack, and other semi-private information exchanges that aren’t as easy to parse and scrape. Places like Reddit and Stack Exchange and DeviantArt are just the prior-gen iteration of hosting for those conversations. But they’re being overwhelmed with bots, marketing teams, special interest mods, and ideologues to the point that they can only deliver a very niche set of content catering to whomever “owns” the space.

  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    All the people complaining must not be using verbatim search (in search tools, toggle from “all results.”)

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is such an apt analogy. I only use it because I have a couple hundred tabs open in Chrome and I am too lazy to port them all over to FF. Even then, I usually have to be really manipulative to the search algorithm to get what I want from general searches and heaven forbid I want to find something that is even the least but taboo. I just use DuckDuckGo for those searches, though it struggles sometimes too.

    I know I need to swap over to FF entirely, but there is just so much, from shifting my PW bank to the hundreds of tabs and thousands of bookmarks. Does anyone know of any FOSS or FF extensions that can smooth that process?

    • GenePull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Bit-warden for password manager, FOSS cross platform. FF should import all the bookmarks. I’d save all open tabs to a new bookmark folder before transfer then open that folder after.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Firefox doesn’t need extensions to handle the password and bookmark imports, it can do those automatically. I saw someone suggest you create a folder in your bookmarks that is your open tabs, bookmark each tab as you close them, import passwords and bookmarks, and open that folder for a relatively painless migration.

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Do not rely on the built-in password managers to keep your passwords safe. Use a purpose-built one like Bitwarden to generate unique ones, save and complete them, agnostic to the browser. Virtually every stealer out there can easily grab the built-in password db’s content.