Thankfully for Taiwan it takes more than 4 years to build and bring up a state of the art fab at a new tech node.
Thankfully for Taiwan it takes more than 4 years to build and bring up a state of the art fab at a new tech node.
How long do you think fabs take to build and upgrade? Intel was working on fixing 10nm for years, this isn’t a software situation where turnaround times are measured in days or weeks. Going from tapeout to silicon for a single line is a 6 month process after the technology process is solidified, forget if you’re doing it while trying to figure out yield problems.
This is a pretty dumb take, honestly. Intel for basically forever operated using their own fab exclusively. After failures to maintain good yield rates at their 10nm node, they had the option of continuing to delay new product lines and be eaten by the competition in AMD, or give in to TSMC temporarily while they worked on fixing their fab in parallel. In fact, they were criticized greatly for not switching to TSMC much earlier.
No, it’s shocking that the destroyed evidence after being explicitly instructed not to.
Turns out even under socialism, I’d still rather have someone else scan and bag my things.
I feel like 90+% of the time I use Google, it’s just because it’s more convenient than going to the actual website I want. Like if I want a Wikipedia article about a movie, it turns out it’s faster to type in the movie name in Google and click than go to Wikipedia and search the movie.
I still use Chrome when I need to Chromecast, any way around that?
Doesn’t the fact that a technology is fundamentally discriminatory mean we should question the use of that technology? Not just shrug our shoulders and say too bad?
If Ukraine has taught us anything, no guarantees are enough.