TehBamski@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 months agotitlei.imgur.comimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1470arrow-down124
arrow-up1446arrow-down1imagetitlei.imgur.comTehBamski@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareMobilityfuture@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·11 months agoGuys is technically a non-gendered term - FWIW
minus-squaremiss_brainfart@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 months agoI haven’t seen it used much in a non-gendered way, so I guess that’s why it has a clear masculine ring in my head
minus-squarehughesdikus@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·11 months agoNot technically. Practically. In real world. As slang. Cause technically and by definition, It’s still very much gendered.
minus-squareMobilityfuture@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoNo, sorry. Please check the facts before correcting someone. In its plural form “guys” is technically non-gendered: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/guy
Guys is technically a non-gendered term - FWIW
I haven’t seen it used much in a non-gendered way, so I guess that’s why it has a clear masculine ring in my head
What’s gals then?
Not technically. Practically. In real world. As slang.
Cause technically and by definition, It’s still very much gendered.
No, sorry. Please check the facts before correcting someone.
In its plural form “guys” is technically non-gendered:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/guy