• saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s more commonly a US thing and it’s like, “Americans saved from America.” whether health, education, or some basic social service that’s being used for profiteering.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hey that orphan-crushing machine is a constitutionally enshrined right. I have the right to mount that thing on wheels and drive it around to crush up orphans wherever I want! And if somebody tries to stop me and gets caught up in and jams the mechanism, I have the right to sue his estate for damages!

  • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, because everybody knows the obvious answer. It’s untethered capitalism. And no it hasn’t always been that way. Politicians weren’t always whores for the rich. That’s a rather recent development that can absolutely be stopped by the will of the people.

    • Crowfiend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      As much as I respect your argument; the Romans. Or any civilisation really. It literally has always been that way.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you implying that the US, and the Roman’s, never had a period of growth and expansion that wasn’t late stage capitalist rot?

        The comment isn’t saying this never happens really, it’s saying it doesn’t have to. This is capitalism with no guardrails.

      • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t know enough about Roman politics to contradict but “any civilisation really” is definitely too broad of a stroke.

  • TheJims@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    The radical leftists marxists communists won’t let us crush orphans anymore

    Make Orphan Crushing Great Again

    Trump 2024

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Of course it’s a mystery. An honest discussion about why orphan-crushing machines need to exist would lead to an honest discussion about where your society’s pain really comes from.

    And the owner class doesn’t want that discussion to happen. Because it would come out that they don’t pay their fair share of the tax burden, which would keep orphan-crushing machines from existing in the first place.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      When you say rewatch cube I think of the movie Cube, but I’m not sure that’s what you meant?

  • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    The real problem is that the orphans need a crushing machine themselves so that they could prevent to be crushed. We must protect the second crushing amendment.

    • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      IDK why people are downvoting my post. That’s literally what that is.

      I visited a talk with Peter Singer in Washington, D.C. a few years ago where people applauded a guy who had considered joining an NGO and decided to become an investment broker and donate to Effective Altruism instead. 🤔